2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback mechanism based iterative metric learning for person re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the poor quality of cameras or the extent distance from the person, the captured pedestrian videos usually suffer from low resolution, which results in the loss of useful information contained in videos. In [21], they introduce a mean distance of multi-metric subspace to address the overfitting problem, usually presented in learned metric subspace-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the poor quality of cameras or the extent distance from the person, the captured pedestrian videos usually suffer from low resolution, which results in the loss of useful information contained in videos. In [21], they introduce a mean distance of multi-metric subspace to address the overfitting problem, usually presented in learned metric subspace-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Descriptor design. Data obtained by detection and tracking modules are used to segment the person's image for generating the descriptor, which can get constructed from data/cues as face [9]- [13]; visual appearance of the whole body [8], [14]- [21]; walking pattern [22], [23]; height and build [1]; and head, torso and limbs of a person [24], [25]; or a combination of these cues. 4) Descriptors matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b, the 'inter-class' variation of different persons may be much smaller as compared with the 'intra-class' variation of the same person. Most traditional methods address these challenges by either designing discriminative features [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] or learning powerful similarity metrics [9,10,11,12,7,13,14,15,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%