Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304)
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1999.832920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback stabilization over commutative rings with no right-/left-coprime factorizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 12) and thus, by Proposition 4.4 of [17], M is a projective A-module of rank 2. Thus, by Theorem 3.2, P is internally stabilizable.…”
Section: Internal Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, 12) and thus, by Proposition 4.4 of [17], M is a projective A-module of rank 2. Thus, by Theorem 3.2, P is internally stabilizable.…”
Section: Internal Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, it is not possible to parametrize all their stabilizing controllers by means of the Youla-Kučera parametrization [4,28]. These results allow us to explain the counterexamples exhibited in [1,12]. We prove that, over a projective-free domain A (e.g., H ∞ (C + ), RH ∞ ), every stabilizable system admits doubly coprime factorizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common feature of the results is that they require the existence of coprime factorizations. This is problematic since all plants do not possess coprime factorizations [1,14], or their existence is not known [10,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following we show that (15) in Theorem 4.2 still holds even in the case where there do not exist right-/left-coprime factorizations over A.…”
Section: The General Casementioning
confidence: 75%