2004
DOI: 10.3166/ejc.10.30-46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedforward Control under the Presence of Uncertainty*

Abstract: In this paper we study the effect of model errors on the performance of feedforward controllers. In accordance with the sensitivity function for feedback control, we define the feedforward sensitivities, © (feedforward from disturbance) and © (feedforward from set-point), as measures for the reduction in the output error obtained by the feedforward control. For "ideal" feedforward controllers based on the inverted nominal model, the feedforward sensitivities equal the relative model errors, which must thus rem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. For PB(x), the intervals are [1,3], [2,5], [3,5], and [4,6], and for PB(y) the intervals are [0, 2], [1,3], [2,5], and [4,5]. To determine PB(x + y), each interval in PB(x) must be added to each interval in PB(y).…”
Section: P-boxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. For PB(x), the intervals are [1,3], [2,5], [3,5], and [4,6], and for PB(y) the intervals are [0, 2], [1,3], [2,5], and [4,5]. To determine PB(x + y), each interval in PB(x) must be added to each interval in PB(y).…”
Section: P-boxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the impact of such uncertainties is clearly important in models of process dynamics, as used, for example, in state and parameter estimation 1, 2 and process control. [3][4][5] It is a challenging problem to propagate uncertainties through a nonlinear ODE system to rigorously predict the uncertainty in the model outputs. The problem is further complicated by the fact that the probability distributions describing the uncertainties may not be known precisely, if they are known at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the two kinds of controllers, feedback and feedforward, it has been demonstrated (Brosilow and Joseph 2002) that even when modelling errors are present in the system, a feedforward control can often reduce the effect of the disturbance better than the feedback control alone. Most of the studies on feedforward control deal with its application to industrial or engineering fields: Seborg et al (1989), Shinskey (1996), Marlin (2000), while a significant mathematical description can be found in Faanes and Skogestad (2004). Literature consistently reports that a feedforward controller is valuable when feedback control is not sufficient and that its practical use may improve the performance, but only when combined with a feedback controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is where , see (Faanes and Skogestad, 2002)). Note that with a larger model error, the positive effect of the feedforward controller may be reduced, and the feedforward action may even amplify the disturbances.…”
Section: Combined Local Pid and Feedforward Control (Lower Block Triamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general analysis of feedforward control under the precence of uncertainty is given in (Faanes and Skogestad, 2002).…”
Section: Lower Block Triangular Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%