2018
DOI: 10.1101/452706
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding behavior of Costa Rican velvet worms: food hiding, parental feeding investment and ontogenetic diet shift (Onychophora: Peripatidae)

Abstract: We report, for the first time in onychophorans, food hiding, parental feeding investment and an ontogenetic diet shift two weeks after birth: from the parent's adhesive used to capture prey, to the prey itself.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…comm). In captivity, our specimen gave birth to numerous offspring and stayed in close contact with them for about three days after birth, behaviors such as food sharing were recorded, young individuals fed on the glue strings used to capture prey rather than the prey itself (Barquero-González et al, 2019). Other specimens were photographed in Manzanillo, Limón in a banana plantation (Alejandra Barrantes pers.…”
Section: Non-diagnostic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…comm). In captivity, our specimen gave birth to numerous offspring and stayed in close contact with them for about three days after birth, behaviors such as food sharing were recorded, young individuals fed on the glue strings used to capture prey rather than the prey itself (Barquero-González et al, 2019). Other specimens were photographed in Manzanillo, Limón in a banana plantation (Alejandra Barrantes pers.…”
Section: Non-diagnostic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costa Rican onychophorans have been placed within this group. Even though Costa Rican onychophorans have been studied in the last few years (Morera-Brenes, Monge-Nájera, & Sáenz, 1988;Monge-Nájera, Barrientos, & Aguilar, 1993;Monge-Nájera, 1995, Mora, Herrera, & León, 1995Monge-Nájera, 1996;Morera-Brenes, & Monge-Nájera, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2012a;; Barquero-González, Acosta-Chaves, Sotela, Villalobos-Brenes, & Morera-Brenes, 2016a; Barquero-González, Alvarado Cabrera, Valle-Cubero, Monge-Nájera, & Morera-Brenes, 2016b; Monge-Nájera, 2017; Barquero-González, Morera-Brenes, & Monge-Nájera, 2018; Barquero-González et al, 2019), their taxonomy remains deficient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%