2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00144-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding behaviour in young children who fail to thrive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower reliability reduces estimates of heritability and common environment and inflates the unique environment effect, which could contribute to the apparent low heritability of weight in early life. However, the first three months of life has also been identified as a critical period when growth is nutrition dependent [37], and because nutrition is primarily an environmental exposure (albeit affected by infant appetite [38]), this could offer an alternative explanation for the low heritability for immediate postnatal growth; consistent with the moderate shared environment effect observed in this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Lower reliability reduces estimates of heritability and common environment and inflates the unique environment effect, which could contribute to the apparent low heritability of weight in early life. However, the first three months of life has also been identified as a critical period when growth is nutrition dependent [37], and because nutrition is primarily an environmental exposure (albeit affected by infant appetite [38]), this could offer an alternative explanation for the low heritability for immediate postnatal growth; consistent with the moderate shared environment effect observed in this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…To examine case–control differences, we took meal type into account, using the two way analysis of variance summarised in Table 5b. Although no statistically significant differences were found in any measured aspect of feeding behaviour, cases did have a significantly lower energy intake than the controls, supporting the findings of Pollitt and Eichler (1976) and Drewett et al (2002). Although the difference was small, if it was as big at other meals the children who failed to thrive would consume about 10% less energy than controls overall.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This was the only clear behavioural difference found. Other differences in feeding behaviour have been found in two previous observational studies (Pollitt & Eichler, 1976;Drewett et al, 2002), but these were of referred cases, and many biases can be introduced by the referral process. Batchelor and Kerslake (1990) Mealtime energy intake and feeding behaviour in children who fail to thrive found that children whose failure to thrive is detected have three times as many feeding problems as those in whom it is not detected, so groups of referred cases may have a higher probability of feeding problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, only between 5 and 10% will have any symptoms or signs of underlying disease (14) . Some evidence of differences in maternal feeding behaviour and appetite and eating behaviour as well as decreased energy intake at meals (31) have been found in the infant (27)(28)(29)(30) . Thus, the majority of children showing a weight faltering pattern have no observable disease or evidence of neglect.…”
Section: Failure To Thrive/weight Falteringmentioning
confidence: 99%