2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps207129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding habits of three dominant myctophid fishes, Diaphus theta, Stenobrachius leucopsarus and S. nannochir, in the subarctic and transitional waters of the western North Pacific

Abstract: The feeding habits of 3 dominant myctophid fishes, Diaphus theta (vertical migrant), Stenobrachius leucopsarus (semi-migrant), and S. nannochir (non-migrant), were studied in relation to their diel vertical migration patterns using time-series sampling during the summers of 1994 to 1996 in the subarctic and transitional waters of the western North Pacific. D. theta and S. leucopsarus fed mainly on euphausiids (mainly Euphausia pacifica), copepods (mainly Metridia pacifica and the Neocalanus plumchrus/fleminger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although oceanic domains are thought to be relatively low in productivity (Springer and McRoy, 1993;Springer et al, 1996), deep-water prey are usually high quality, and may be very concentrated near the surface at night due to diel vertical migration even if total productivity of the water column is relatively low. Vertically migrating fish, squid, and zooplankton species that live in deep basin waters tend to store large energy reserves so they can fast for extended periods and maintain near neutral buoyancy over a wide range of depths and pressures (Moku et al, 2000;Visser and Jonasdottir, 1999). The diet of seabirds that forage over deep water basins usually include species with relatively high energy densities, such as northern lampfish (Stenobrachius leucopsarus), and northern smoothtongue (Leuroglossus schmidti; Iverson et al, 2007;Lance and Roby, 2000).…”
Section: Foraging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although oceanic domains are thought to be relatively low in productivity (Springer and McRoy, 1993;Springer et al, 1996), deep-water prey are usually high quality, and may be very concentrated near the surface at night due to diel vertical migration even if total productivity of the water column is relatively low. Vertically migrating fish, squid, and zooplankton species that live in deep basin waters tend to store large energy reserves so they can fast for extended periods and maintain near neutral buoyancy over a wide range of depths and pressures (Moku et al, 2000;Visser and Jonasdottir, 1999). The diet of seabirds that forage over deep water basins usually include species with relatively high energy densities, such as northern lampfish (Stenobrachius leucopsarus), and northern smoothtongue (Leuroglossus schmidti; Iverson et al, 2007;Lance and Roby, 2000).…”
Section: Foraging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diel vertical migrations of oceanic prey species can result in large temporal patchiness of food availability, with prey brought close to the surface during the night (Moku et al, 2000). Prey are distributed over a large range of spatial scales (Maravelias et al, 1996), with aggregations often described by a nested hierarchical patch structure (Fauchald and Erikstad, 2002;Kotliar and Wiens, 1990;Russell et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nocturnal predation on myctophids at GMR is in accordance with their migration. Migrating myctophids are nocturnally present in depths of 150 to 500 m, where they prey on euphausiids, amphipods and copepods and are themselves subject to predation (Clarke 1978, Watanabe et al 1999, Moku et al 2000, Butler et al 2001. Thus, the daytime descent takes them below the reach of bentho-pelagic fishes at the top of shallow topography like GMR.…”
Section: Habitat-dependent Resource Utilisation and The Ssl-hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual ingestion (I; mg C m -2 yr -1 ) was 941 for T. pacifica, 493 for T. japonica, 205 for P. abyssalis, and 487 for C. challengeri. The total annual ingestion (=predation) of the 4 amphipods (1892 mg C m -2 yr -1 mesopelagic fishes (Beamish et al 1999, Moku et al 2000, Uchikawa et al 2001, suggesting that they are of trophic importance in the pelagic ecosystems of this region. However, reliable data for estimating trophic functions, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%