1986
DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(86)90258-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) larvae with an artificial dry food, living zooplankton and mixed food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Os dados finais comprovaram que a combinação dos alimentos naturais com dietas artificiais permitiram desenvolvimento significativamente maior (P<0,01). Resultados semelhantes foram encontrados por Szlaminska & Przybyl (1986), em Cyprinus carpio, Kerdchuen & Legendre (1995), em Heterobranchus longifilis, e Soares et al (2000), em Carassius auratus.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Os dados finais comprovaram que a combinação dos alimentos naturais com dietas artificiais permitiram desenvolvimento significativamente maior (P<0,01). Resultados semelhantes foram encontrados por Szlaminska & Przybyl (1986), em Cyprinus carpio, Kerdchuen & Legendre (1995), em Heterobranchus longifilis, e Soares et al (2000), em Carassius auratus.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Therefore, in the controlled rearing of cyprinid larvae, it is quite common that daily duration of feeding agrees closely with the period of human daily activity, and food is delivered only in the daytime, typically for only 13–15 h a day (e.g. Szlamińska and Przybyl, 1986; Vanhaecke et al., 1990; Wolnicki and Appelbaum, 1993; Wolnicki and Korwin‐Kossakowski, 1993; Hamáčková et al., 1995, 1998; Kamler et al., 1995; Wolnicki, 1996; Wolnicki and Myszkowski, 1999). In most cyprinid species, 13–15 h feeding a day is sufficient to obtain satisfactory growth rates of larvae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, it seems that acceptable growth rates in a number of fish species cannot be maintained using exclusively live food due to its low nutrient content and restricted food intake (Olsen, Reitan & Walso 1992). However, the performance of MD's for a variety of fish species was considerably enhanced when co-fed with live zooplankton (Kanazawa, Teshima, Inamori, Sumida & Iwashita 1982;Szlaminska & Praybyl 1986;Ehrlich, Cantin & Rust 1989;Fermin & Bolivar 1991;Marte & Duray 1991;Tandler & Kolkovski 1991;Walford, Lim & Lam 1991;Person Le Ruyet et al 1993;Lavens, Sorgeloos, Dhert & Devresse 1995). However, a lower performance is commonly reported when inert diets are fed to larvae from the onset of exogenous feeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the composition, palatability or physical characteristics of the dry feed (Person Le Ruyet, Alexandre, Thebaud & Mugnier 1993), to the larva's inability to properly digest the feed (Holt 1993;Kolkovski, Tandler, Kissil & Gertler 1993;Walford & Lam 1993;Zambonino Infante & Cahu 1994), or to the low attractiveness of the non-mobile particle for the fish larva. However, the performance of MD's for a variety of fish species was considerably enhanced when co-fed with live zooplankton (Kanazawa, Teshima, Inamori, Sumida & Iwashita 1982;Szlaminska & Praybyl 1986;Ehrlich, Cantin & Rust 1989;Fermin & Bolivar 1991;Marte & Duray 1991;Tandler & Kolkovski 1991;Walford, Lim & Lam 1991;Person Le Ruyet et al 1993;Lavens, Sorgeloos, Dhert & Devresse 1995). The successful use of Artemia nauplii alone or co-fed with a commercial diet at the start feeding or during early development of different sturgeon species has been reported by a number of researchers (Bardi et al 1998;Dilauro, Krise & Fynn-Aikins 1998;Mohler, Kim King & Farrell 2000;Volkman, Pangle, Rajchel & Sutton 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%