2017
DOI: 10.1002/job.2239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeling interrupted—Being responsive: How online messages relate to affect at work

Abstract: Summary Being constantly connected to others via e‐mail and other online messages is increasingly typical for many employees. In this paper, we develop and test a model that specifies how interruptions by online messages relate to negative and positive affect. We hypothesize that perceived interruptions by online messages predict state negative affect via time pressure and that perceived interruptions predict state positive affect via responsiveness to these online messages and perceived task accomplishment. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(173 reference statements)
7
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study set out to determine the effect of smartphone use for work during off-work hours on work-life conflict, and also the moderating role segmentation preference. The results were consistent with previous studies, in that the more individuals use smartphones during off-work hours, the more they experience work-life conflict (Derks & Bakker, 2014;Dettmers, 2017;Harris et al, 2015;Sonnentag et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study set out to determine the effect of smartphone use for work during off-work hours on work-life conflict, and also the moderating role segmentation preference. The results were consistent with previous studies, in that the more individuals use smartphones during off-work hours, the more they experience work-life conflict (Derks & Bakker, 2014;Dettmers, 2017;Harris et al, 2015;Sonnentag et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Hence, as suggested by previous researches (e.g., Sonnentag, Reinecke, Mata, & Vorderer, 2018;Wilkinson, Tomlinson, & Gardiner, 2017), this study includes individuals from all walks of life and not merely on those with traditional family households and childcare as the primary nonwork concern. Within this context, the researcher tested the following hypothesis:…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, work-family enrichment occurs when positive, motivating experiences at work provide employees with resources that enhance subsequent affect or performance at home (Greenhaus, & Powell, 2006). Research suggests that ICT-related behaviours can potentially enhance positive work-family enrichment when such behaviours produce positive affect via perceived task accomplishment (Sonnentag, Reinecke, Mata, & Vorderer, 2017) and are used autonomously (Ohly & Latour, 2014).…”
Section: Spillover Process Measurement Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that recovery experiences are inherently positive (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007), incorporating measures of affect may provide a more direct and precise measure of the intervening mechanism between the relationship of interest to this study. Further research should examine measures of affective reactions resulting from work behaviors like workplace telepressure that are subjective and could result in either positive or negative state-like reactions (Sonnentag, Reinecke, Mata, & Vorderer, 2017). Another intervening mechanism between workplace technology use and well-being outcomes is the degree to which work messaging is controlled (extrinsically motivated) or autonomous (intrinsically motivated; Ohly & Latour, 2014).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical perspective, there are several reasons as to why work interruptions may have detrimental effects on employee well-being. First, interruptions tend to trigger emotional strain because they hinder goal achievement (Sonnentag, Reinecke, Mata, & Vorderer, 2018;Zijlstra et al, 1999). Second, if an interruption occurs, employees have to adapt their current behaviour to accommodate the interrupting event, which requires additional effort.…”
Section: Work Interruptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%