2021
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feelings from the heart: Developing HRV decrease‐trigger algorithms via multilevel hyperplane simulation to detect psychosocially meaningful episodes in everyday life

Abstract: In daily life, we experience various affective states, stress and episodes of vulnerability, which might challenge wellbeing and health. However, these vulnerable states are often subtle and less salient (Brosschot et al., 2018). Therefore, in this article we propose a simulation approach toward the development of a real-time system to identify psychosocial states associated with increased vulnerability and stress. Grounded on the concept of additional heart rate variability reductions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enables a new and fresh perspective on creativity research by focusing on the moment-to-moment fluctuations of creative abilities. Future studies could advance this approach by adding further psychological or contextual variables such as affect, wellbeing, and attention as well as environmental surroundings, participant's physical activity, or neurophysiological indicators (e.g., ECG, EEG; Weizenbaum et al, 2020), which might allow psychophysiological triggering and robust predictions of creative states (Agnoli et al, 2020;Schwerdtfeger and Rominger, 2021;Rominger et al, in pressc). A more complex assessment of psychological and psychophysiological states in combination with the ABC could gain further highly relevant information on how, when, and why people show higher creative abilities.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables a new and fresh perspective on creativity research by focusing on the moment-to-moment fluctuations of creative abilities. Future studies could advance this approach by adding further psychological or contextual variables such as affect, wellbeing, and attention as well as environmental surroundings, participant's physical activity, or neurophysiological indicators (e.g., ECG, EEG; Weizenbaum et al, 2020), which might allow psychophysiological triggering and robust predictions of creative states (Agnoli et al, 2020;Schwerdtfeger and Rominger, 2021;Rominger et al, in pressc). A more complex assessment of psychological and psychophysiological states in combination with the ABC could gain further highly relevant information on how, when, and why people show higher creative abilities.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow some control over the demands of the stressful events instigated. Alternatively, real-time analysis of HRV data might allow stressful events in daily life to be detected through individually meaningful decreases of vmHRV controlled for physical activity with algorithms such as Schwerdtfeger and Rominger ( 2021 ) have used. Adapting such algorithms could maybe in the future allow to calculate vmHRV recovery time by incorporating the influence of physical activity instead of retrospectively controlling for it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, reliability analyses were calculated on the between- (RKR) and the within-person (RC) level for both tasks separately using GTA (Brennan, 2001; Cronbach, 1972; for review see, Shrout & Lane, 2012; for application in EMA context see Calamia, 2019; Schwerdtfeger & Dick, 2019; Schwerdtfeger & Gerteis, 2014; Schwerdtfeger & Rominger, 2021; and in a creativity context see, Silvia, 2008; Silvia et al, 2008). Following Nezlek (2017), we differentiated between Level 1, which were the four raters, Level 2, which were the prompts, and the person level (Level 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrout and Lane (2012) delivered a detailed guidance on how to decompose the variance in everyday life data, which is due to person, item, situation, and their respective interactions. Based on the generalizability theory (Brennan, 2001; Cronbach, 1972; for a review see, Shrout & Lane, 2012), this differentiation of variance proportions allows to calculate the within- and between-person reliability estimates (see, e.g., Schwerdtfeger & Dick, 2019; Schwerdtfeger & Rominger, 2021, for applications). Given that EMA assessment of divergent thinking allows to reliably assess creative ideation performance, it could contribute to the ecological validity of creativity research by replicating findings from well-controlled settings in natural environments (Reis, 2012).…”
Section: Benefits Of An Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema)mentioning
confidence: 99%