2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.01.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feigenbaum scaling, Cantorian space–time and the hierarchical structure of standard model parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the Cabibbo angle θ C plays the role of the mixing angle. According to experiment, sin (θ C ) ≈ 0.23, which is close to δ −1 (see also [8]).…”
Section: Numerical Surprisessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, the Cabibbo angle θ C plays the role of the mixing angle. According to experiment, sin (θ C ) ≈ 0.23, which is close to δ −1 (see also [8]).…”
Section: Numerical Surprisessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…7. The δ-relations between coupling constants (but not their explicit values) were previously observed by Goldfain [8].…”
Section: Numerical Surprisesmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to the idea that the wave-particle duality can be associated by means of the quantum vacuum with a phase transition. Moreover, a Feigenbaum-Goldfain scenario on the genesis of the material structures from the vacuum states is possible [37,38].…”
Section: The Vacuum As a Superconducting Type Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This puzzle is referred to as the fermion ''flavor problem'' [11,19] and it continues to challenge to the day our understanding of particle physics. Motivated by the relevance of nonlinear dynamics in field theory [12][13][14][15][16][17]20,21], this work suggests that the number of fermion flavors may be directly derived from the dynamics of coupling flow equations. Specifically, we find that the number of flavors results from demanding stability of the coupling flow about its fixed-point solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%