2004
DOI: 10.1139/e03-072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Felsenmeer persistence under non-erosive ice in the Torngat and Kaumajet mountains, Quebec and Labrador, as determined by soil weathering and cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating

Abstract: Soil analyses and terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating are combined and a conceptual model proposed to explain altitudinal weathering contrasts in high-latitude highlands. We show that summits in the Torngat and Kaumajet mountains were covered by ice during the Last Glacial Maximum, and that their felsenmeer cover probably survived multiple glaciation events. For similar lithologies, soils on felsenmeer covered summits are signigicantly more weathered than those below the felsenmeer limit, displaying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
118
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inference, however, does not preclude the accumulation of cold-based ice in the peneplain region. For instance, flat summit surfaces in Labrador, Canada, were buried under non-erosive ice during past glaciations as revealed by erosion island plots based on cosmogenic 10 Be and 26 Al (Marquette et al, 2004). In our case, the combination of cosmogenic 10 Be and 21 Ne concentrations does not provide any evidence for significant periods of burial, because six out of seven samples have a nuclide inventory that is consistent with a simple exposure history (Fig.…”
Section: Evaluating Past Burial Of the Peneplain By Glaciers Or Cold-mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This inference, however, does not preclude the accumulation of cold-based ice in the peneplain region. For instance, flat summit surfaces in Labrador, Canada, were buried under non-erosive ice during past glaciations as revealed by erosion island plots based on cosmogenic 10 Be and 26 Al (Marquette et al, 2004). In our case, the combination of cosmogenic 10 Be and 21 Ne concentrations does not provide any evidence for significant periods of burial, because six out of seven samples have a nuclide inventory that is consistent with a simple exposure history (Fig.…”
Section: Evaluating Past Burial Of the Peneplain By Glaciers Or Cold-mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The observed altitudinal contrast between glacially eroded terrain, and summits that support tors, blockfields and shattered bedrock, can be explained in two ways (Ballantyne 1997(Ballantyne , 2007Ballantyne et al 1998Ballantyne et al , 2006Ballantyne et al , 2007Fabel et al 2002;Marquette et al 2004;Sugden et al 2005). First (hypothesis 1), the boundary between the two may represent the upper limit of the last ice sheet at the LGM, implying that glacially unmodified summits and plateaux remained above the level of the last ice sheet as nunataks, thus constraining maximum ice-sheet thickness.…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining species detected, both kaolinite and gibbsite are significantly better represented in samples from above the inferred upper limit of glacial erosion, at p < 0.02 and p < 0.1 respectively ( 2 test). Gibbsite has been shown to be significantly better represented in soil samples from summits that escaped LGM glacial erosion elsewhere in Scotland (Ballantyne 1994;Ballantyne et al 1998) as well as in Wales (McCarroll & Ballantyne 2000), Ireland (Rae et al 2004;Ballantyne et al 2006Ballantyne et al , 2007 and Québec-Labrador (Marquette et al 2004). Studies of gibbsite in montane soils and lowland grusses in Scotland show that it represents a product of pre-Devensian weathering and develops preferentially in acid lithologies in the early stages of saprolite formation (Wilson 1985;.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cold-based ice also existed in mid-latitude regions, especially at high elevations (Bierman 45 et al, 2015) and along thin ice sheet margins (Colgan et al, 2002). Since cosmic rays attenuate 46 as they pass through Earth materials at a rate controlled by density, burial by ~10 m of ice causes 47 production of nuclides by spallation to become negligible (Lal, 1988 1999; Briner et al, 2003;Briner et al, 2006;Corbett et al, 2013;Håkansson et al, 2008;Kaplan 56 et al, 2001;Marquette et al, 2004;Stroeven et al, 2002;Sugden et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%