2017
DOI: 10.1785/0220170129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Felt Reports for Rapid Mapping of Global Earthquake Damage: The Doughnut Effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Hough and Martin (2021a) confirmed the result of past studies (e.g., Mak and Schorlemmer, 2016), that, apart from very strong shaking that may not be reported (Bossu et al, 2018), the likelihood that an individual will report their observations to the DYFI system depends strongly on the severity of shaking they experienced. Focusing on moderate earthquakes provides the opportunity to explore further the extent to which participation in the DYFI system may have been shaped over time by average household income.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results of Hough and Martin (2021a) confirmed the result of past studies (e.g., Mak and Schorlemmer, 2016), that, apart from very strong shaking that may not be reported (Bossu et al, 2018), the likelihood that an individual will report their observations to the DYFI system depends strongly on the severity of shaking they experienced. Focusing on moderate earthquakes provides the opportunity to explore further the extent to which participation in the DYFI system may have been shaped over time by average household income.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is revealed by the strong correlation between the number of new users and the number of intensities 11 and 12 collected (Figures 1, 4). As mentioned before, these intensities values are automatically excluded during data processing because crowdsourcing is highly unlikely to work under such extreme circumstances, and so they are considered to result from tests or jokes (Bossu et al, 2018a). Although some users influenced by high emotional state may have reported such values in good faith, it reaffirms that these reports are not reliable enough to be integrated in situation maps (Bossu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Figure 4 | Topmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…intrinsic uncertainties of rapid earthquake damage scenarios (Bossu et al, 2016). A schematic pattern, named the "doughnut effect, " has been statistically identified for data collected by the EMSC where damaged zones are free or almost free of felt reports and app launches, or at least the local ratio of app launches amongst the locally installed apps is much lower for the same earthquake in damaged areas than in areas affected by lower shaking levels (Bossu et al, 2018a). While the absence of such a pattern is proof of the absence of significant damage, its existence is not a proof on its own of damage and can be due to local communication issues (Bossu et al, 2018a).…”
Section: From Crowdsourced Data To Situational Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For potential future events, this strategy might allow oversampling the macroseismic field and modelling the intensity variability in each commune, except in localities with extensive damage (cf. the Doughnut Effect in Bossu et al, 2017) where field surveys would then be needed (as done by Sira, 2015).…”
Section: Intensity Attenuation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%