2020
DOI: 10.1590/0370-44672019730078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FEM-DEM simulation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) laboratory tests

Abstract: Finite/discrete element methods (FDEM) are hybrid numerical models that use algorithms to analyze the transition from continuous to discontinuous. This type of formulation allows modeling physical laboratory tests with greater proximity to reality. This article proposes to simulate the average behavior of a uniaxial compression test campaign. The tests were modeled and calibrated based on the strength and the fracture pattern using Geomechanica Inc. Irazu two-dimensional software. The simulated results were an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The platen displacement velocity, the viscous damping factor, and the contact penalties were defined in a uniaxial compression test model discussed by Oliveira et al (2020). The value for the platen velocity used in the simulation of the BTS was 0.03 m /s.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The platen displacement velocity, the viscous damping factor, and the contact penalties were defined in a uniaxial compression test model discussed by Oliveira et al (2020). The value for the platen velocity used in the simulation of the BTS was 0.03 m /s.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact penalties were modeled (Stefanizzi et al, 2009). in order to find the lowest standard deviation for principal stress (σ1) in the uniaxial compression test (Oliveira et al 2020). The normal and tangential contact penalties for the fracture were in the order of 100 times greater than the modulus of elasticity.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations