2019
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female breast cancer risk in Bryansk Oblast, Russia, following prolonged low dose rate exposure to radiation from the Chernobyl power station accident

Abstract: Background Ionizing radiation is a known cause of female breast cancer, but there have been few studies of the risk after prolonged radiation exposure at low dose rates. Methods This population-based case-control study estimated breast cancer risk after ∼25 years’ exposure to radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Cases (n = 468) were women ≤55 years old when first diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during October 2008 thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There were contradictory findings on breast cancer incidence trends in Belarus in relation to Chernobyl fallout that could be due to differences in study methods, catchment area and follow‐up period 5,38 . Recently, an analytical study on 468 breast cancers in contaminated Bryansk oblast of Russia utilizing individual dose estimates showed an elevated radiation‐related risk of breast cancer following the exposure at doses up to 41 cGy (mean breast dose of 1.3 cGy) with excess odds ratio (EOR) of 0.57 per 1 cGy (95% CI: −0.0, 15.5) 17 . Given possible recall bias embedded in the case‐control study design, scarce information on study methodology, and the wide nonsignificant confidence interval of the EOR on continuous dose scale, the results of the case‐control study need to be replicated in other groups of women exposed due to Chernobyl fallout, and before that should be taken with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were contradictory findings on breast cancer incidence trends in Belarus in relation to Chernobyl fallout that could be due to differences in study methods, catchment area and follow‐up period 5,38 . Recently, an analytical study on 468 breast cancers in contaminated Bryansk oblast of Russia utilizing individual dose estimates showed an elevated radiation‐related risk of breast cancer following the exposure at doses up to 41 cGy (mean breast dose of 1.3 cGy) with excess odds ratio (EOR) of 0.57 per 1 cGy (95% CI: −0.0, 15.5) 17 . Given possible recall bias embedded in the case‐control study design, scarce information on study methodology, and the wide nonsignificant confidence interval of the EOR on continuous dose scale, the results of the case‐control study need to be replicated in other groups of women exposed due to Chernobyl fallout, and before that should be taken with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breast cancer risk was higher in women younger than 45 years at the time of the accident, but the estimates were based on a small number of cases 5 . Recently, a significant positive association between individually assessed doses to the breast (mean dose of 1.3 centigray, cGy) and risk of breast cancer was reported in a case‐control study in Bryansk oblast for cases diagnosed about 22 to 27 years after the accident 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3]. Эти программы выполнялись сотрудниками МРНЦ в сотрудничестве с коллегами из областных медицинских и санитарно-эпидемиологических учреждений, а в более отдалённый период после аварии -в сотрудничестве с другими научными и медицинскими центрами России [4], коллегами из Японии [5,6], Европейского Сообщества [7][8][9][10][11] и США [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
unclassified
“…В процессе и после выполнения программ по ретроспективной оценке доз, по мере накопления медицинских данных, проведена оценка и анализ последствий аварии на Чернобыльской АЭС для загрязнённых радионуклидами территорий Брянской области, выполненных в рамках международных радиационно-эпидемиологических исследований по технологии «случай-контроль» [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Следует отметить, что всесторонние оценки и анализ радиационных рисков для здоровья населения всех загрязнённых радионуклидами территорий РФ, по данным Национального радиационно-эпидемиологического регистра (НРЭР), приведены в монографиях [19][20][21][22].…”
unclassified