2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9246-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Abstract: Several studies suggest that females may offset the costs of genetic incompatibility by exercising pre-copulatory or post-copulatory mate choice to bias paternity toward more compatible males. One source of genetic incompatibility is the degree of relatedness among mates; unrelated males are expected to be genetically more compatible with a female than her relatives. To address this idea, we investigated the potential for inbreeding depression and paternity biasing mechanisms (pre- and post-copulatory) of inbr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there is ample evidence that inbreeding has deleterious fitness consequences in this species [35 -39]. Second, while female guppies show a pre-copulatory preference for unfamiliar males or males with a rare colour phenotype [40 -43], which indirectly reduces the risk of inbreeding, they are apparently unable to distinguish among related males when familiarity cues are controlled for [39,44,45]. Third, males can undermine female choice by means of gonopodial thrusting [46], a coercive mating tactic that allows males to forcibly inseminate females [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there is ample evidence that inbreeding has deleterious fitness consequences in this species [35 -39]. Second, while female guppies show a pre-copulatory preference for unfamiliar males or males with a rare colour phenotype [40 -43], which indirectly reduces the risk of inbreeding, they are apparently unable to distinguish among related males when familiarity cues are controlled for [39,44,45]. Third, males can undermine female choice by means of gonopodial thrusting [46], a coercive mating tactic that allows males to forcibly inseminate females [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2003), (2) There is little evidence of mate choice for unrelated males in Poeciliids (e.g., Pitcher et al. 2008; Ala-Honkola et al. 2010), but see (Kelley et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014), so there is no immediate benefit of discriminating against a related male's sperm (e.g., Pitcher et al. 2008). In short, there is no obvious adaptive explanation why females would partially fertilize a clutch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies of adults of the cooperatively breeding African cichlid, N. pulcher, have failed to show either kin preference or kin avoidance (Striver et al 2008) despite the documented ability of juveniles to use relatedness during shoaling decisions (Le Vin et al 2010). Similarly, in the guppy there is at best only a marginal trend for mating partners to be unrelated (Pitcher et al 2008;Johnsson et al 2010) despite an increase in offspring number (Johnson et al 2010) and quality (Pitcher et al 2008) produced by unrelated partners. Perhaps kin-biased mate-choice decisions will only be found in populations where inbreeding depression is already present and there are considerable potential benefits to increasing heterozygosity and maintaining genetic variation.…”
Section: Kin Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%