Female directors and corporate innovation in family firms in India. Do leverage ratios and mandatory CSR expenditure matter?

Abstract

Purpose Based on data collected using the purposive sampling technique extracted from a secondary data source, this paper aims to examine the relationship between female directors and firm innovation. The paper also examines the impact of leverage ratios and corporate social responsibility (CSR) expenditure on the association between female directors and firms’ innovation. Design/methodology/approach The feasible general least regression technique was applied to overcome potential endogeneity issues associated with female directors and corporate innovation spending. Findings With subsequent control of individual and firm variables, the first findings of this study indicate that female directors significantly decrease firms’ innovation spending. The second outcomes of this study show that the leverage ratio considerably improves corporate innovation spending. The third findings show that the leverage ratio positively moderates the association between female directors and corporate innovation spending. The fourth findings show that CSR expenditure significantly improves firm innovation spending but does not moderate the association between female directors and corporate innovation spending. Research limitations/implications Based on dependency theory, robust and reliable conclusions suggest that female directors’ engagement on the Indian board needs more than biological sex, that is, the required expertise. The paper also provides policy implications for female expertise in minority engagement on the board of listed firms in India, especially when the firm desires to increase its corporate innovation spending. Originality/value This study is among the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to comment on mandatory CSR expenditure as an independent variable on innovation or a moderating variable between female directors and corporate innovation. Similarly, the family-controlled management perspective in this study deepens the debate on gender diversity and corporate innovation.

Intangible Assets and Resource Allocation: Insights From European Companies

“…To be specific, the number of employees and the market value of the firm are positively related to investments in intangibles, validating our expectations. This, in turn, confirms that large and profitable firms devote more resources towards intangible asset investments, supporting previous evidence (Oware & Appiah, 2022). As far as fixed assets are concerned, a perusal of Table 2 shows that tangibility is adversely associated with investments in intangibles.…”

Influencing Factors and Mechanisms of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation under Green and Low-Carbon Transition: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

“…Regarding the impact of female executives on CSR, some research findings suggest that companies with female executives perform better in areas such as charitable donations [24]. Other studies have found that female executives lack the professional knowledge to improve enterprise innovation because they are more cautious about taking strategic risks, which suppresses innovation activities and restricts the expenditure of CSR [25]. When gender inequality is low, female directors facilitate fulfilling CSR.…”

Managerial long‐termism and corporate innovation: Evidence from China through text mining approaches

“…Barker and Mueller (2002) showed that executives with better education have a stronger ability to absorb new ideas and are therefore more receptive to innovation. Chen et al (2018) found that female directors tend to invest more in innovation, Naveed et al (2022) discovered that board gender diversity contributes to green innovation, and Oware and Appiah (2023) found that female directors in India's family firms have a negative association with innovation.…”

“…Barker and Mueller (2002) showed that executives with better education have a stronger ability to absorb new ideas and are therefore more receptive to innovation. Chen et al (2018) found that female directors tend to invest more in innovation, Naveed et al (2022) discovered that board gender diversity contributes to green innovation, and Oware and Appiah (2023) found that female directors in India's family firms have a negative association with innovation. However, Hambrick (2007) posits that although executives' demographic characteristics can be used as proxies for their cognition, the "black-box problem" that the use of demographic indicators cannot truly help to understand the psychological factors driving executive behavior.…”