2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female directors and impression management in sustainability reporting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
2
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
9
106
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, female leaders have been found to be less manipulative and more ethical and transparent in regard to information disclosure [62][63][64][65][66]. In particular, it was established that female directors positively impact financial reporting disclosure [67][68][69]. As previously indicated by Vermeir and Van Kenhove (2007) [70], female directors show a low propensity to commit fraud as well as a superior commitment to apply higher ethical standards in the decision-making process [71], which leads to increased transparency in sustainability disclosures [68,72,73].…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the past, female leaders have been found to be less manipulative and more ethical and transparent in regard to information disclosure [62][63][64][65][66]. In particular, it was established that female directors positively impact financial reporting disclosure [67][68][69]. As previously indicated by Vermeir and Van Kenhove (2007) [70], female directors show a low propensity to commit fraud as well as a superior commitment to apply higher ethical standards in the decision-making process [71], which leads to increased transparency in sustainability disclosures [68,72,73].…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Next, the model presents endogeneity, highlighting the need to use dynamic estimation. Moreover, to test for the existence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation, we applied the modified Wald test (Hawn & Kang, ; Martínez‐Ferrero & García‐Sánchez, ) and Wooldridge test, respectively (Hawn & Kang, ; García‐Sánchez, Suárez‐Fernández, & Martínez‐Ferrero, ). The results of the modified Wald test indicate heteroscedasticity problems in the model because the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity is rejected ( p value = .000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all studies, gender diversity is defined in the binary of male/female. Standard means of calculating gender include the percentage or proportion of females on a board, or employing Blau's diversity index [23,24,32,37,40,42,43,[49][50][51]. Shoham et al [29] offer one of few studies to consider the implications of using binary language, in particular masculine language, in the recruitment of women to company boards.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numbers of women remain comparatively low across countries, researchers have investigated how women influence governance on boards of directors in organisations all over the world [23,25,28,35,50,51,53]. In all of these studies, the cultural differences that overlay any performance of gender and how women may be able to participate in boards of directors remain largely absent from analyses, with the exception of Alazanni et al [50].…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation