1991
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female DUI offenders: a comparison to male counterparts and an examination of the effects of intervention on women's recidivism rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…females were more likely to reoffend or have accidents after convictions. Wells-Parker et al (1991) found that administration of an intensive life-style assessment to high problem females was associated with increased recidivism. These results suggest that the progression of alcohol-related problems may be accelerated among female drinking drivers, and especially among female multiple offenders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…females were more likely to reoffend or have accidents after convictions. Wells-Parker et al (1991) found that administration of an intensive life-style assessment to high problem females was associated with increased recidivism. These results suggest that the progression of alcohol-related problems may be accelerated among female drinking drivers, and especially among female multiple offenders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fewer women DUI arrestees have a prior record; once arrested, women are less likely to repeat their offense (Argeriou and Paulino, 1976;Shore et al, 1988). In clinical evaluations, too, female drunk drivers are less likely than male drunk drivers to be identified as high-risk problem drinkers (Argeriou and Paulino, 1976;Wells-Parker et al, 1991). Women's drunk driving is usually far less acute than men's.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Drunk Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are less likely than men to be repeat DUI offenders (C’de Baca, et al, 2001; Lapham, Skipper, Hunt, & Chang, 2000; Lapham, Skipper, & Simpson, 1997; Wells-Parker, Pang, Anderson, McMillen, & Miller, 1991), making it difficult to obtain samples with sufficient numbers of women to examine gender differences in recidivists. One of the first studies to do so selected consecutive female referrals to a screening program for first-time DUI offenders, frequency matched males to females by date of referral to obtain similar numbers of male and female offenders, and examined predictors of re-arrest within 5 years, including drug use, alcohol problems in a parent or spouse, physical or sexual abuse, treatment referral and completion, and scores on an alcohol screen (Lapham, Skipper, Hunt, & Chang, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%