1998
DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1998.11927560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Genital Anxieties: Views from the Nursery and the Couch

Abstract: The author evaluates developmental and clinical data concerning female genital anxieties in an attempt to address the question of its clinical utility. An effort is made to clarify evidence for female genital anxiety as distinct from castration anxiety in females in the clinical situation and in development. This paper examines these concepts from the perspective of the author's detailed observational and clinical data, which are central to this report.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technical language of our field is full of problems because our data are gathered by people about people in an interactive process; opinion becomes theory, yet simultaneously our language aspires to objectivity and generalizability. It has been argued, often and persuasively, that calling body anxiety in women "phallic castration" is misleading and that the phenomenon would be rendered more accurately by the term genital anxiety or female genital anxiety (Goldberger 1999;Olesker 1998;Dorsey 1996;Shaw 1995;Bernstein 1990;Chehrazi 1986). For example, "rational" may inadvertently be equated with the value judgments strong/clear/male; "irrational" with soft/murky/female.Patients frequently embrace these mistaken affinities, but there is no need for analysts to echo the emotional accretion as "theory" (see Balsam 1994).…”
Section: Recasting the Lexicon Of Female Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technical language of our field is full of problems because our data are gathered by people about people in an interactive process; opinion becomes theory, yet simultaneously our language aspires to objectivity and generalizability. It has been argued, often and persuasively, that calling body anxiety in women "phallic castration" is misleading and that the phenomenon would be rendered more accurately by the term genital anxiety or female genital anxiety (Goldberger 1999;Olesker 1998;Dorsey 1996;Shaw 1995;Bernstein 1990;Chehrazi 1986). For example, "rational" may inadvertently be equated with the value judgments strong/clear/male; "irrational" with soft/murky/female.Patients frequently embrace these mistaken affinities, but there is no need for analysts to echo the emotional accretion as "theory" (see Balsam 1994).…”
Section: Recasting the Lexicon Of Female Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now have an opportunity to challenge these fixed attitudes. It has been argued, often and persuasively, that calling body anxiety in women "phallic castration" is misleading and that the phenomenon would be rendered more accurately by the term genital anxiety or female genital anxiety (Goldberger 1999;Olesker 1998;Dorsey 1996;Shaw 1995;Bernstein 1990;Chehrazi 1986). Since Freud, we have learned about many different kinds of genital anxieties-e.g., those concerning loss of virginity, penile penetration, or the uterine and perineal strains of childbirth-that center on fantasies, referring to the present or future, about the personal female body.…”
Section: Recasting the Lexicon Of Female Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meninas não têm pênis e invejam coisas de meninos, e estes, por sua vez, não têm atributos de meninas e invejam, consequentemente, coisas de meninas. Encontramos dois artigos que se baseiam em duas pesquisas de observação sobre esta questão, ambas realizadas nos Estados Unidos (Olesker, 1998;Senet, 2004).…”
Section: O Angustiante Universo Do Múltiplo Do Difuso E Do Imprecisounclassified
“…In keeping with his age, I often worked within Carlton's displacement in play, and actively reconstructed his infantile confusion about separation, loss of control, body damage, girl-boy differences, and the danger of his anger (Inderbitzen and Levy 1998;Sugarman 2008). I based my interpretations on what I learned from his play, the behavior he brought into the sessions, our previous work, our transference and countertransference interactions, and my knowledge of common fantasies among two-to-threeyear-old children (Galenson and Roiphe 1980;Olesker 1998;Tyson 1989;Tyson and Tyson 1990a). My interpretations included "reconstructions" that were necessarily, in part, "constructions" (Kris 1956) because of the degree to which a child two to three years old experiences and expresses overwhelming feelings in action rather than words (Balbernie 2001;Schore 2001).…”
Section: Further Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%