2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Genital Hair-Thread Tourniquet Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review was devoted to female HTTS only. 15 The review presented here aims to synthesize the data from existing body of literature about risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prevention of genital HTTS in males and females 21 years and younger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent systematic review was devoted to female HTTS only. 15 The review presented here aims to synthesize the data from existing body of literature about risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prevention of genital HTTS in males and females 21 years and younger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the potential long-term complications, it is imperative that HTTS be recognized and diagnosed accurately and swiftly upon patient presentation to the clinician. A recent systematic review was devoted to female HTTS only 15 . The review presented here aims to synthesize the data from existing body of literature about risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prevention of genital HTTS in males and females 21 years and younger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021265200). Investigators are experienced in systematic reviews 9–12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study objectives, eligibility criteria, outcome definitions, search strategy, process of data extraction, statistical analyses, and method of study quality assessment were all defined in a protocol. Investigators are experienced in systematic reviews [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators are experienced in systematic reviews. [20][21][22][23][24] Studies assessing the impact of LNG-IUS on the risk of ovarian carcinoma were included. Letters to the editor, conference abstracts, book chapters, guidelines, Cochrane reviews, and expert opinions were excluded.…”
Section: Materials S and Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%