“…See also volume two's broader discussion distinguishing the ethics of existence specific to male-male relations from the more codified obligations incurred by wives(HS II, 22 [Fr 32]).20 In short, without Foucault foregrounding this point, the emergence of ideas concerning a more "mutual" relationship between spouses is not to be confused with an increase in recognition of the principles of sexual equality.21 When Foucault describes Roman imperial bureaucracy as seeking to increase its hold on the lives of individuals, he also claims that "this phenomenon cannot be separated from the new relations being established in the same period between Christianity and empire. An institution at first recognized, then made official, the Christian Church occupies more and more easily and visibly functions of organization, management, control, and regulation of society," (HS IV, 195).22 See the related projects on women's same-sex eros further developed through the lens of Boehringer's parallel view of sexuality as not a universal, constant or "invariant"-to use the term suggested early in Use of Pleasure(HS II, 4 [Fr10]; and her focus on assymmetries of same-sex eros and of gender inBoehringer (2014Boehringer ( , 2021.23 In this regard see, for a specific account, Foucault's discussion of Methodius (HS IV, 127 [Fr 166]), and for a general and…”