2016
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female-induced remote regulation of sperm physiology may provide opportunities for gamete-level mate choice

Abstract: In sedentary externally fertilizing species, direct interactions between mating partners are limited and prefertilization communication between sexes occurs largely at the gamete level. Certain combinations of eggs and sperm often have higher fertilization success than others, which may be contingent on egg-derived chemical factors that preferentially attract sperm from compatible males. Here, we examine the mechanisms underlying such effects in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis, where differential s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a few EC molecules have been identified in broadcast spawning species (e.g., Böhmer et al, ; Riffell, Krug, & Zimmer, ; Ward, Brokaw, Garbers, & Vacquier, ; Yoshida, Murata, Inaba, & Morisawa, ) and we currently have no information in this regard for M. galloprovincialis . Furthermore, it would be interesting to examine the effect of OA on EC‐induced changes in sperm physiology, for example, pH i changes and influx of calcium when mixed with ECs (e.g., see the techniques used in Kekäläinen & Evans, ; Kekäläinen, Larma, Linden, & Evans, ). Such studies would provide a detailed understanding of cellular and biochemical processes underlying the effects of OA on gamete interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, only a few EC molecules have been identified in broadcast spawning species (e.g., Böhmer et al, ; Riffell, Krug, & Zimmer, ; Ward, Brokaw, Garbers, & Vacquier, ; Yoshida, Murata, Inaba, & Morisawa, ) and we currently have no information in this regard for M. galloprovincialis . Furthermore, it would be interesting to examine the effect of OA on EC‐induced changes in sperm physiology, for example, pH i changes and influx of calcium when mixed with ECs (e.g., see the techniques used in Kekäläinen & Evans, ; Kekäläinen, Larma, Linden, & Evans, ). Such studies would provide a detailed understanding of cellular and biochemical processes underlying the effects of OA on gamete interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the fitness consequences of OA will depend on whether the observed effect disrupts the capacity of eggs to promote fertilizations by preferred sperm. In M. galloprovincialis, females use ECs to differentially regulate sperm movement and physiology (Evans et al, 2012;Kekäläinen & Evans, 2016;Oliver & Evans, 2014)-processes that ultimately favor sperm from genetically compatible males when multiple ejaculates compete for fertilization (as is likely in realistic mass spawning events) (Lymbery et al, 2017). This form of gamete-mediated mate choice provides benefits to females in terms of enhanced offspring viability (Oliver & Evans, 2014 Kekäläinen, Larma, Linden, & Evans, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Crean et al. ; Kekäläinen and Evans ). Likewise, cryptic female choice for sperm of compatible mates in an intermale competition scenario has been demonstrated, however, only at the individual level (Olsson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to modify sperm properly could be a general and widespread mechanism by which females discriminate against the sperm of less‐preferred males, as has been shown to be the case with sperm chemoattraction (Kekäläinen & Evans, ) and with female sperm ejection and sperm digestion (Manier et al ., ; Firman et al ., ). Similarly, two kinds of studies implicate a role for ovarian fluid in mediating sexual selection within populations.…”
Section: Evolutionary Implications Of Pemsmentioning
confidence: 99%