2017
DOI: 10.5202/rei.v8i2.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Labor Force Participation and Voter Turnout: Evidence from the American Presidential Elections

Abstract: This study investigates a state-level panel dataset for the five most recent U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a positive relationship between female LFPR and the participation in USA democratic elections i.e. the number of voters increases with female LFPR (Cebula & Alexander, 2017). The black-white racial gap in LFPR is greater than the hispanic-white gap LFPR in USA (Cajner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lfpr and Democracy And Discriminationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is a positive relationship between female LFPR and the participation in USA democratic elections i.e. the number of voters increases with female LFPR (Cebula & Alexander, 2017). The black-white racial gap in LFPR is greater than the hispanic-white gap LFPR in USA (Cajner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lfpr and Democracy And Discriminationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is a positive relationship between female LFPR and the participation in USA democratic elections i.e. the number of voters increases with female LFPR [12]. The black-white racial gap in LFPR is greater than the hispanic-white gap LFPR in USA [13].…”
Section: Lfpr and Democracy And Discriminationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Carreras (2018) suggests that this paradox-that women vote more than men despite having lower levels of political commitment-responds to the greater "civic duty" felt by women. Added to this is an increase in the female labor force in the past decades, which may also contribute to explaining their greater attendance at the polls (Cebula and Alexander, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%