2000
DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0179:fpaesg>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Philopatry and Extreme Spatial Genetic Heterogeneity in White-Tailed Deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Haplotypes were observed from three divergent clades geographically distributed across the study area. Our results showed more intermixing of haplotypes than was noted in deer populations in other parts of the species range as evidenced by Purdue et al (2000) who found little spatial overlap of haplotypes in South Carolina. However, other investigations in similar Midwestern environments yielded comparable levels of high haplotype diversity and substantial spatial mixing of haplotypes (J.…”
Section: Spatial Genetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Haplotypes were observed from three divergent clades geographically distributed across the study area. Our results showed more intermixing of haplotypes than was noted in deer populations in other parts of the species range as evidenced by Purdue et al (2000) who found little spatial overlap of haplotypes in South Carolina. However, other investigations in similar Midwestern environments yielded comparable levels of high haplotype diversity and substantial spatial mixing of haplotypes (J.…”
Section: Spatial Genetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Isolation‐by‐distance is generally regarded as a baseline pattern in landscape genetics that is characterized by increasing genetic differentiation among individuals, groups, or populations with increasing geographical distance (van Strien, Holderegger, & Van Heck, ). Isolation‐by‐distance often results from spatially limited gene flow, whereas dispersal to all distances with equal probabilities will not lead to such a pattern (Purdue, Smith, & Patton, ; Rivers, Butlin, & Altringham, ). Isolation‐by‐distance was assessed using Mantel tests at the group level for males and females separately in ARLEQUIN v 3.5.1.2 (Excoffier & Lischer, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBD and IBR are not, however, mutually exclusive and sometimes a combination of the two best explains genetic structuring (Metzger, Espindola, Waits, & Sullivan, 2015;Piertney, MacColl, Bacon, & Dallas, 1998). Species that are widespread and relatively continuously distributed are expected to exhibit either panmixia or clinal patterns of genetic structure explained by IBD, particularly when comparing populations at a large scale (Alcaide et al, 2009;Purdue, Smith, & Patton, 2000;Ralston & Kirchman, 2012). A few studies have emerged where widespread, continuously distributed species exhibit unexpected patterns of IBR (Pease et al, 2009;Pilot et al, 2006), but the extent to which species with broad geographic ranges exhibit IBD or IBR is unclear (Basto et al, 2016;Frankham, Ballou, & Briscoe, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%