1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02765388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female preferences for large, heavy mates inSchistocerca americana (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also suggest that the duration of guarding can be dictated by contests between males, because large males displaced small males while copulating or guarding, and resisted takeover attempts from other, smaller males. Alternatively, females may prefer to mate with large males (Kosal & Niedzlek‐Feaver 1997). It is not clear, however, why a large proportion of females remains unmated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also suggest that the duration of guarding can be dictated by contests between males, because large males displaced small males while copulating or guarding, and resisted takeover attempts from other, smaller males. Alternatively, females may prefer to mate with large males (Kosal & Niedzlek‐Feaver 1997). It is not clear, however, why a large proportion of females remains unmated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings of higher assortative mating and preference for larger males as mates, substantiates previous reports (e.g. Brown, ; Goulson et al ., ; Kosal & Niedzlek‐Feaver, ; Harari et al ., ; Bonduriasky, ; Woodward et al ., ). Large‐sized males are believed to have better genes and thus more sperm supply (Phelan & Barker, ; Bissoondath & Wiklund, ); the latter being substantiated by the higher percent egg viability in pairs with larger males in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within grasshopper species, size and mass variables are usually highly correlated (e.g., Shotwell 1941;Norris 1950Norris , 1952Blackith & Verdier 1960;Farrow 1982;Atkinson & Begon 1988;Kosal & Niedzlek-Feaver 1997), but the situation for reproductive variables is less clear. Some authors have found that ovariole number, clutch size, egg size, or oocyte development rates are associated with body size (Norris 1950(Norris , 1952Richards & Waloff 1954;Blackith & Blackith 1968;Farrow 1975Farrow , 1982White & Contreras 1979;Hugueny & Louveaux 1986;Atkinson & Begon 1987, 1988Butlin et al 1987;Ritchie et al 1987;Wall & Begon 1987;Landa 1992;Moehrlin & Juliano 1998;Hatle et al 2002;Danner & Joern 2004), whereas others have not (Smith 1972, Dearn 1977, Atkinson & Begon 1987, Ritchie et al 1987, Luker et al 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others explored body size and fecundity as a consequence of different nutrition, crowding, phase state, season, age, temperature, photoperiod, wing length, mating status, or predation risk. In some grasshoppers, fecundity is influenced by number of matings (Walker et al 1999), and in others, larger individuals mate more (Cueva del Castillo & Núñez-Farfán 2002, Cueva del Castillo 2003, or females prefer large males (Kosal & Niedzlek-Feaver 1997). An additional confounding factor is that time to lay in some species is influenced by environment-induced reproductive diapause (see Uvarov 1977, Weissman & French, 1980, Weissman 1979, Lightfoot & Weissman 1991 or social factors (Stauffer & Whitman 1997, Stauffer et al 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%