2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female resistance and male preference in a stream-dwelling isopod: effects of female molt characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they did not measure the glycogen levels of females, the suggested mechanism for the source of the cost implies that both sexes face the same cost. Thus a sexual conflict probably occurs in this species too, as indicated by their contest behaviour prior to guarding (Sparkes et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they did not measure the glycogen levels of females, the suggested mechanism for the source of the cost implies that both sexes face the same cost. Thus a sexual conflict probably occurs in this species too, as indicated by their contest behaviour prior to guarding (Sparkes et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether female resistance and the corresponding male harassment are the outcome of an intersexual conflict (as is hypothesised here), or whether female resistance represents a method of female choice, is a subject of ongoing discussion (e.g., Jormalainen and Merilaita 1995;McLain and Pratt 1999;Sparkes et al 2000Sparkes et al , 2002Eberhard 2002). According to the latter hypothesis, only males with high fitness can successfully mate with females that remain resistant, and resistance would represent only a special form of female choice (e.g., Eberhard 2002).…”
Section: Sexual Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the laboratory, aggressive competition between guarding males and non-guarding males is easily observed, and takeovers by non-guarding males often occur if they are larger than guarding males (Yoshino et al 2004). In the isopod Idotea baltica (Jormalainen andMerilaita 1993, 1995) and Lirceus fontinalis (Sparkes et al 2000(Sparkes et al , 2002, females aggressively struggle against male guarding attempts, which acts as female choice. Female blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus also have the potential to choose large males by resisting male guarding attempts (Jivoff and Hines 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The decision to guard is made by the male, but the success of guarding depends on whether females can resist male guarding attempts (e.g., Strong 1973;Jormalainen andMerilaita 1993, 1995;Jivoff and Hines 1998;Sparkes et al 2000Sparkes et al , 2002. Hence, if females cannot resist male guarding attempts, male guarding behavior may restrict the ability of females to inspect and choose other males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%