2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female size constrains egg size via the influence of reproductive organ size and resource storage in the seed beetle Callosobruchus chinensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not an unusual finding as in many organisms maternal body size determines egg size and therefore the size of hatchlings [3336]. A proximate explanation for this relationship might be morphological constraints, as the available body space might determine the overall egg volume that can be carried, or the size of the maternal organ through which eggs pass during oviposition might impose constraints [37]. Alternatively, there might be metabolic constraints such that the resource transport rate from the mother to the egg (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is not an unusual finding as in many organisms maternal body size determines egg size and therefore the size of hatchlings [3336]. A proximate explanation for this relationship might be morphological constraints, as the available body space might determine the overall egg volume that can be carried, or the size of the maternal organ through which eggs pass during oviposition might impose constraints [37]. Alternatively, there might be metabolic constraints such that the resource transport rate from the mother to the egg (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such a relationship has previously been reported in other species, including Coleoptera (Fox, ; Kawecki, ; Guntrip et al ., ; Fox & Czesak, ; Fischer et al ., ; see also Kishi, ). In the seed beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis , this relationship was shown to be constrained by the width of the ovipositor (Yanagi & Tuda, ). Alternatively, smaller females with lower nutrient reserves may produce small eggs because of physiological constraints (Fox & Czesak, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, egg size is correlated with maternal body size (Fox & Czesak, 2000;Fischer et al, 2002). This relationship is probably derived from the width of the ovipositor (Yanagi & Tuda, 2012) or from the lower nutrient reserves of small females (Fox & Czesak, 2000). Similarly, old females or food-stressed females tend to produce smaller eggs than do young females (Fox, 1993a) or well-fed females (Fox, 1993a;Kyneb & Toft, 2006;Bauerfeind et al, 2007), respectively; this relationship probably reflects the depletion of resources for egg production (Wiklund et al, 1987;Fox & Czesak, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black circle represents the correlation coefficient for the whole data set when information on individual variation in resource acquisition is excluded, and the coloured circles represent the correlation coefficient for each treatment. Treatments for which the correlation coefficient differs significantly from zero are indicated with asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) to egg (Sakai & Harada, 2001;Steiger, 2013;Yanagi & Tuda, 2012).…”
Section: Effects Of Resource Acquisition On Life-history Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%