Female University Students Respond to Gender Violence through Dialogic Feminist Gatherings

Abstract

Within the framework of the "Free_Teen_Desire" research project led by the University of Cambridge and funded by the programme Marie Curie Actions 1 , a survey was conducted. Vignette-Test data for 127 female university students (ages 18-27 years) in Spain reveals that the wish to hook up with a violent young man significantly decreases after a gathering on the topic of the Mirage of Upward Mobility, a successful programme elaborated in Dialogic Feminism (Beck-Gernsheim, Butler & Puigvert, 2003). In the pre-test, 78.4% of the respondents stated that their female friends would like to hook up with a violent man at a party, while this percentage decreased to 38.5% when they responded concerning themselves. After the pre-test, there was a one-hour gathering and debate. The subsequent post-test revealed that only 48.8% of the respondents stated that their female friends would like to hook up with a violent man at a party, and 14.9% of the respondents made the same statement concerning themselves. The survey presented pictures of four men accompanied by a short explanation of their characters. The explanations of man 1 and man 3 included sentences that describe behaviours characterized as gender violence in previous international surveys (Banyard et al., 2005;Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 1999;Gross et al., 2006;Kalof et al., 2001). The descriptions of man 2 and man 4 only included non-sexist behaviours. The data did not significantly change when we exchanged the pictures of man 2 and man 4 in the instrument with the pictures of the men with violent profiles and then administered the post-test. For different groups of respondents, the period between the pre-test and the gathering as well as between the gathering and the post-test were changed from fifteen minutes to one and two weeks. In all cases, we obtained similar results for the pre-and post-tests. However, additional research is required to demonstrate how long the effect of the gathering endures and to identify the processes that can increase or decrease the effect over time.Keywords: Dialogic Feminist Gatherings, gender violence, female university students, RIMCIS -International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 5 No.2 July 2016 pp. 183-203 2016 Hipatia Press ISSN: 2014-3680 DOI: 10.17583/rimcis.2016.2118 Estudiantes Universitarias Confrontan la Violencia de Género a través de Participar en Tertulias Feministas Dialógicas Lidia Puigvert University of Cambridge ResumenEn el marco del proyecto de investigación "Free_Teen_Desire" dirigido desde la Universidad de Cambridge y financiado por el Programa Marie Curie Actions, se realizó una encuesta usando como instrumento de medida un test de viñetas ("Vignette-Test"). La encuesta fue realizada en España y contó con la participación de 127 estudiantes universitarias (chicas, entre 18 y 27 años). Los datos revelan que la intención de "liarse" con un chico violento decrecía significativamente después de que las estudiantes encuestadas participasen en una Tertulia Feminista Dialógica sobre E...

Reconstruction of Autobiographical Memories of Violent Sexual-Affective Relationships Through Scientific Reading on Love: A Psycho-Educational Intervention to Prevent Gender Violence

“…Third, the book employs a “language of desire” ( Flecha and Puigvert, 2010 ), which describes reality in terms of like, desire, emotions, and feelings, in contrast to a “language of ethics,” which analyzes reality in terms of what is good and what is bad. Other research has shown that using a “language of desire” - instead of a “language of ethics” alone - is much more effective for deeply understanding and discussing the coercive discourse and, particularly, for individuals having real freedom to decide, dismantling attraction to violent masculinities ( Puigvert, 2016 ). For the aforementioned reasons, Radical Love ( Gómez, 2015 ) aids in separating attractiveness and violence.…”

“…Likewise, research has shown that dialogs among friends can create expectations about behavior and gender in relation to the aggressive behavior of men ( Kimmel, 1996 ; Giordano, 2003 ), so conversations within peer groups are likely to be shaped by the coercive discourse and might reproduce it. Yet the fact that the coercive discourse, and different kinds of masculinities and emotions ( Ramírez Rodriguez et al, 2017 ) have been socially constructed opens up the possibility for the subjects to enact their own agency and free choice, and modify the influence of such discourse ( Gómez, 2015 ; Puigvert, 2016 ).…”

“Architects of Their Own Brain.” Social Impact of an Intervention Study for the Prevention of Gender-Based Violence in Adolescence

“…All of the aforementioned prevention programs have been informed by particular research findings from psychology and other social sciences on gender violence among teens and have made it possible for adolescents to engage in specific transformations of their sexual-affective thought and behavior in ways that can protect them from experiencing violence in their intimate relationships. The case of the MEMO4LOVE project, the intervention research reported in this article, builds upon the various research projects on the topic of preventive socialization of gender violence (Valls et al, 2008;Gómez, 2015;Puigvert, 2016;, which have developed a strong body of evidence on the need to tackle the dominant coercive discourse in society to help youth escape from the social imposition of attraction models that link desire with violence and aggressiveness. The intervention program in the project adds to the current knowledge on prevention strategies for adolescents by focusing on the dominant coercive discourse, being a group-level intervention and school-based.…”

Propelling Children’s Empathy and Friendship

“…Another SEA is dialogic gatherings (DGs) in which students establish a dialogue around high-quality texts in areas such as literature, science, feminism, mathematics, music, art, or theology, among others [45][46][47][48]. In dialogic literary gatherings (DLGs), for instance, students read and discuss classic literature in an egalitarian dialogue, providing more opportunities to those who have participated less to contribute to the discussion, and hence overcome power interactions [49].…”