2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0737-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Females go where the food is: does the socio-ecological model explain variation in social organisation of solitary foragers?

Abstract: The socio-ecological model (SEM) links ecological factors with characteristics of social systems and allows predictions about the relationships between resource distribution, type of competition and social organisation. It has been mainly applied to group-living species but ought to explain variation in social organisation of solitary species as well. The aim of this study was to test basic predictions of the SEM in two solitary primates, which differ in two characteristics of female association patterns: (1) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
59
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
5
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beginning in August 2002, I and Malagasy field assistants had regularly (re)captured and marked individuals of a population of 50-150 individuals of M. murinus at a time (for details, see [22,23]). Capture was performed with Sherman live traps in three consecutive nights about once per month during the non-wet season, and five to nine times per year in a study area of 25 ha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in August 2002, I and Malagasy field assistants had regularly (re)captured and marked individuals of a population of 50-150 individuals of M. murinus at a time (for details, see [22,23]). Capture was performed with Sherman live traps in three consecutive nights about once per month during the non-wet season, and five to nine times per year in a study area of 25 ha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example is Microcebus , which currently consists of 19 described species [Mittermeier et al, 2010;Radespiel et al, 2012]. Detailed observational studies on the social organisation of mouse lemurs have been conducted on only 4 of these species, all of which inhabit the western lowland dry forest habitats ( Microcebus murinus [Radespiel, 2000;Kappeler, 2002, 2006;Dammhahn and Kappeler, 2009]; M. ravelobensis [Weidt et al, 2004]; M. berthae Kappeler, 2005, 2009]; M. griseorufus [Génin, 2008]). Previous studies described mouse lemurs as solitary foragers, forming sleeping associations during the daytime, which appears to be the basic social unit in these species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-specific features limit the fitness of females and males resulting from intersexual differences in parental investment (Trivers, 1972). An assumption of the SEM is that the spatio-temporal scattering of females is determined predominately by the distribution of habitat resources and risks (Dammhahn and Kappeler, 2009). As the dispersive sex in mammals, males seek out reproductively receptive females (Altmann, 1990), so their juxtaposition should be based primarily on the spatial arrangement of those females (Clutton-Brock, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the constructs of the SEM, no thorough attempt has been made to explain variation in general regarding the social systems of solitary species (Dammhahn and Kappeler, 2009); furthermore, it has gone unnoticed as an applied framework for studying direct disease transmission in small mammals, like hantaviruses in rodents. Hantavirus researchers also have overlooked the importance of females and their impact on male movements and virus dissemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation