2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70055-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review

Abstract: Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome demonstrate a decrease in abduction, external rotation and extension strength of the affected side compared with healthy controls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
155
1
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
155
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrastively, muscular change has known to affect functional alignment in the frontal plane, which eventually influences patellofemoral kinetics. The hip muscle, especially gluteus medius weakness leads to adduction at the hip joint, which in turn increases genu valgum functionally, and this has shown to be correlated with increase of PFP (Alba-Martin et al, 2015;Bolgla et al, 2008;Dierks et al, 2008;Herrington, 2014;Myer et al, 2014;Powers et al, 2003;Prins & van der Wurff, 2009;Salsich et al, 2012). These all together tell that interplay of skeletal alignment and muscular action is …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastively, muscular change has known to affect functional alignment in the frontal plane, which eventually influences patellofemoral kinetics. The hip muscle, especially gluteus medius weakness leads to adduction at the hip joint, which in turn increases genu valgum functionally, and this has shown to be correlated with increase of PFP (Alba-Martin et al, 2015;Bolgla et al, 2008;Dierks et al, 2008;Herrington, 2014;Myer et al, 2014;Powers et al, 2003;Prins & van der Wurff, 2009;Salsich et al, 2012). These all together tell that interplay of skeletal alignment and muscular action is …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 NOS has been identified by the Cochrane Collaboration as 1 of the 2 most useful quality assessment tools for nonrandomized studies 13 and has been used frequently to assess the quality of nonrandomized studies. [14][15][16] The NOS uses a star rating system, with stars assigned for adhering to the following criteria.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An established protocol was used to aid interpretation of the results of the review for the NOS 18 consistent with previous systematic reviews 19 and for the PEDro Scale 20 ( Table 2).…”
Section: Data Extraction and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%