“…In considering this technological context, we will refer both to the often overlooked gendered history of our writing implements, such as the typewriter, as well as discuss the wider and more abstract technologies of for example the peer‐reviewed journal, as well as the social technologies of textual representation in general. In thinking about the complicated ways in which gender is assigned to an author in the writing process, and to challenge the notion that we can reasonably reduce the act of writing — a mediated, technologically embedded practice — to a gender binary or to a gender identity, we find inspiration in our shared interest in the figure of the cyborg, as this has been used both in science and technology studies (e.g., Clynes and Kline, ; Gray, , ; Grenville, ), feminist theory (Balsamo, ; Campbell, ; Haraway, ; Sharp, ), organization studies (Muhr, ; Nyberg, 2009; Parker, , ) and as a trope in popular culture analysis (e.g., Bowring, ; Czarniawska and Gustavsson, ). Particularly important for our use of the cyborg metaphor is the way Haraway () uses the metaphor explicitly to challenge gender binaries.…”