2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminine after cricothyroid approximation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that an average fundamental frequency of over 155 Hz is desirable to be perceived as female and that the degree of perceived femaleness significantly correlates with a higher average fundamental frequency. [2][3][4]10 It has also been found, however, that average fundamental frequency is not the only contributing factor in creating the perception of femaleness. 5 In particular, physical appearance and voice appear to be interacting factors in listener judgments of the femaleness of male-to-female transsexuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that an average fundamental frequency of over 155 Hz is desirable to be perceived as female and that the degree of perceived femaleness significantly correlates with a higher average fundamental frequency. [2][3][4]10 It has also been found, however, that average fundamental frequency is not the only contributing factor in creating the perception of femaleness. 5 In particular, physical appearance and voice appear to be interacting factors in listener judgments of the femaleness of male-to-female transsexuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS is a common tool used in medical and speech-language pathology research. 15,[20][21][22][23] Speakers were instructed to evaluate their voice based on their own perceptions of their voice and not from the recording. They completed two scales to measure subjective impression of their voice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no numbers visually presented on the scale, but the computerized scoring scale ranged from 0 to 1,000 in order to ensure a highly sensitive measure. The VAS measure is commonly used in medical and speech-language pathology research (Campbell & Lewis, 1990;Grant et al, 1999;McNeill et al, 2008;Rammstedt & Rammsayer, 2002;Van Borsel, Van Eynde, De Cuypere, & Bonte, 2008).…”
Section: Speaker Self-perception Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%