Western feminism has been arguing about issues of sensitivity to cultural specificity and difference for a number of years now. The horns of the dilemma involve, on the one hand, the recognition that context, specificity, and difference are all vital to a successful feminism. If feminism is dedicated to respect for women, and if women, like men, are located in various differing contexts, then the only way to respect women as individuals is to acknowledge and respect those contexts as shapers of the self. Western feminists have worked (though not always with success) to resist the cultural imperialism that adheres virtually automatically, regardless of good intentions, to a Western (particularly white) location: the blindness that privilege generates to the nuances of gender equity and women's power in other cultures. On the other hand, however, is the recognition that the cultural relativism to which this earnest effort at respect sometimes gives way does nothing to change the oppression of women, because the "culture" that is often preserved through such respect is a patriarchal one that preserves male privilege at women's expense and is defined by and for the interests of particular groups of men.This dilemma is exhibited daily not only in white, middle class feminists' interpretations (or ignorance) of the experiences of Western women of color and poor women, but also in (generally, but not exclusively, white and middle class) Western feminists' reactions to various situations that women face in non-Western cultures. In this paper, I focus on the practice of veiling. Throughout the modern era, the West has tended to view Islam as a barbaric source of women's inequality, and the veil has been seen as the ultimate symbol, if not tool, of this inequality. Fueled by media reports of the oppressive practices of the Taliban in Afghanistan, antiAmerican fury in Iran, and Saudis demanding restrictions on U.S. women soldiers, many Westerners tend to associate veiling with extreme gender oppression, even seeing the veil as the ultimate symbol of a unified, monolithic Islam. 1 This belies a great diversity in the practice, however, and completely ignores the fact that many Muslim women not only participate voluntarily in veiling, but defend it as well, indeed claiming it as a mark of agency, cultural membership, and resistance. The history and practices of veiling vary widely from country to country in terms of style -ranging from sheer-fabric robes to head scarves to dark, heavy, fulllength coverings of the entire face and body -as well as in how the practice is carried out, again running the gamut from overt coercion (state mandates and