Feminist Aesthetics and Copyright Law

Craig, Carys J.

doi:10.1017/cbo9781107588479.015

Cited by 19 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On copyright law and gender, see eg Burk, 2006;Craig, Turcotte and Coombe, 2011;Craig, 2007;Craig, 2014;Bartow, 2006;Doagoo, 2014;Kraut, 2016;Greene, 2008. 2 See also Dolland v Champneys (1758) 1 CPC 28, 30.…”

Section: Endnotesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

Lai

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Endnotesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

Lai

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“… 1. On copyright law and gender, see, for example, Burk (2006), Craig et al (2011, 2014), Craig (2007), Bartow (2006), Doagoo (2014), Kraut (2016) and Greene (2008). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

Lai

2020

Social & Legal Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patents have been theorised as serving a multitude of different aims and functions since their inception. The role of patents is chameleon-like. At the same time, studies show that males are significantly more likely than females to be the inventors of patented inventions. A nascent but emphatic body of literature highlights that this is, in part, due to patent law itself being gendered. This article examines how gendered patenting and patent law have implications for the role of patents. It shows that the role of patents is not only a chameleon but a gendered chameleon.

show abstract

Circulation and Control

Delamaire¹,

Slauter²

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nineteenth century witnessed a series of revolutions in the production and circulation of images. From lithographs and engraved reproductions of paintings to daguerreotypes, stereoscopic views, and mass-produced sculptures, works of visual art became available in a wider range of media than ever before. But the circulation and reproduction of artworks also raised new questions about the legal rights of painters, sculptors, engravers, photographers, architects, collectors, publishers, and subjects of representation (such as sitters in paintings or photographs). Copyright and patent laws tussled with informal cultural norms and business strategies as individuals and groups attempted to exert some degree of control over these visual creations. With contributions by art historians, legal scholars, historians of publishing, and specialists of painting, photography, sculpture, and graphic arts, this rich collection of essays explores the relationship between intellectual property laws and the cultural, economic, and technological factors that transformed the pictorial landscape during the nineteenth century. This book will be valuable reading for historians of art and visual culture; legal scholars who work on the history of copyright and patent law; and literary scholars and historians who work in the field of book history. It will also resonate with anyone interested in current debates about the circulation and control of images in our digital age.

show abstract

Feminist Aesthetics and Copyright Law

Cited by 19 publications

References 15 publications

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

The Role of Patents as a Gendered Chameleon

Circulation and Control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About