1998
DOI: 10.1080/13569779808449948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist democracy: The case for women's committees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its documentation has largely reflected an ongoing tendency towards descriptive, reflective accounts — arguably mirroring earlier tendencies within the history of the WLM in the UK (Scott, ; Wright, ). Stokes (), Halford and Leonard () and Bashevkin () are notable exceptions. Stokes examined what remained formally of women's initiatives in 1995, but with a focus on the political committees and representative dimensions of these in contrast to my analysis focusing on the working and understandings of the non‐political actors.…”
Section: Local Government Gender Equality Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its documentation has largely reflected an ongoing tendency towards descriptive, reflective accounts — arguably mirroring earlier tendencies within the history of the WLM in the UK (Scott, ; Wright, ). Stokes (), Halford and Leonard () and Bashevkin () are notable exceptions. Stokes examined what remained formally of women's initiatives in 1995, but with a focus on the political committees and representative dimensions of these in contrast to my analysis focusing on the working and understandings of the non‐political actors.…”
Section: Local Government Gender Equality Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work on gender equality, or 'municipal feminism' as it was coined, represented a particular instantiation of feminist activity among others, although it has generally been underplayed in the literature examining this (MacKay 2008). At the time such work was contested as opposed to universally welcomed - both by other feminists (Coote andPattullo 1990, Halford 1990), and those within councils (Button 1984, Stokes 1998. Although this phenomena received some academic attention at the time (for example, Button 1984, Goss 1984, Edwards 1988, Harriss 1989, Brownill and Halford 1990, Halford 1990, Bruegel and Kean 1995, Edwards 1995, this was largely focused on documenting the establishment, topics and form of work taking place, and discussing its political dynamics and significance.…”
Section: Mapping the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has not been much work subsequently that has examined municipal feminism, nor in relation to more recent local government gender equality work. Notable exceptions are Stokes (1998), andBashevkin (2006) who examined the legacy of municipal feminism in London and Toronto. Thus, the relationship between municipal feminist initiatives and gender equality legislation has not been fully examined.…”
Section: Mapping the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included adopting a three-pronged approach to gender equality: supporting women's initiatives in the community; establishing equal opportunities practices within local authority employment; and ensuring that the broad range of local government policies addressed women's specific concerns and perspectives. Importantly, women's committees drew on outside expertise, and made themselves accountable to the community, through the mechanism of co-option: women from local women's organizations were co-opted on to the committees (Stokes, 1998).…”
Section: Gender Policy Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%