2002
DOI: 10.1080/0269172022000025570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist epistemology as social epistemology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In different ways the liberal, radical and Marxist feminist theorists argued. Those who argue that there are epistemically valuable feminine ways of knowing integral to women, without providing a social analysis, could also be viewed as resisting certain elements of a social epistemology (Grasswick, 2004;Grasswick, and Webb, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In different ways the liberal, radical and Marxist feminist theorists argued. Those who argue that there are epistemically valuable feminine ways of knowing integral to women, without providing a social analysis, could also be viewed as resisting certain elements of a social epistemology (Grasswick, 2004;Grasswick, and Webb, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the fundamental concerns and beliefs of radical feminists, as revealed by the large and diverse body of theoretical, methodological and pedagogical literature that has been generated in the last three decades, it is now common to hear feminists and other gender scholars describe radical feminists as a group of feminists that focus on the patriarchy as the social system which functions in hierarchical and dominating ways, such that individual women are subordinate to individual men. For this reason, and epistemic injustice (see Grasswick, 2004;Grasswick, and Webb, 2002), radical feminists often react in anger by 'whipping up' their argument for support against women's oppression. Their anger is usually directed at men, who they see as embodying the patriarchal power relations of the entire societal system (Jagger, 1985).…”
Section: Radical Feminist Theoristsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many identify feminist epistemology as a form of social epistemology, where the latter is broadly characterized as encompassing the epistemological study of the ways in which social relations and institutions shape knowledge practices and achievements. Though Heidi Grasswick thinks that 'by far the majority of work in feminist epistemology is best understood as a form of social epistemology,' she also notes that feminist epistemology predates social epistemology as the latter is now understood (Grasswick 2008). Thus, instead of thinking of feminist epistemology as simply a subarea or form of social epistemology, we might think of it as a significant inspiration and resource in the development of social epistemology, something that cannot be ignored by (mainstream) social epistemologists.…”
Section: Feminist Metaepistemic Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…See , Nelson (1993), and . For a recent discussion of feminist epistemology as social epistemology, see Grasswick (2008). has something to offer.…”
Section: Feminist Virtue Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation