2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values in Three Decades of Computers and Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also tells me that there are multiple levels of accepted and contested narratives within a group, they co-exist and influence each other (Fivush, 2010). In this case a resistance narrative (of publicly asserting her position) is what Hajar imprinted which in essence challenged the canonical (FtF) narrative replicated and reproduced by the powerful tutor (De Hertogh, Lane and Ouellette, 2019). It is important to note that the interplay between resistance and dominance underline a structure of power that is relational and evolving in an ongoing dialectic interaction (Fivush, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion: To See or Not To See; Celebrating A Dominant Nar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also tells me that there are multiple levels of accepted and contested narratives within a group, they co-exist and influence each other (Fivush, 2010). In this case a resistance narrative (of publicly asserting her position) is what Hajar imprinted which in essence challenged the canonical (FtF) narrative replicated and reproduced by the powerful tutor (De Hertogh, Lane and Ouellette, 2019). It is important to note that the interplay between resistance and dominance underline a structure of power that is relational and evolving in an ongoing dialectic interaction (Fivush, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion: To See or Not To See; Celebrating A Dominant Nar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the theoretical frameworks underlying distance education account for diverse identities will provide a new way of rethinking differences and proposing critical interventions in distance higher education. This techno-feminist approach with intersectional analytics has become a flourishing subfield of posthumanism (De Hertogh et al, 2019) and that we see reflected in the proposals for distance higher education. As Shivers et al ( 2019) by placing intersectional feminism at the core of the framework of experiences, an awareness is generated about the interactions that community members experience between the use of language, cultural practices, positions of power and the use of technology.…”
Section: Shivers Et Al (2019) Argue Thatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Digital technologies and teaching and learning platforms used in higher education can limit the feminist response and reproduce dominant structures and discourses that reinscribe power relations along the axes of gender, race, sexuality, nationality, and class (De Hertogh, et al, 2019). For these authors, study centered in materiality of platforms can and will lead to nuanced conversations, major breakups, and productive interventions.…”
Section: Materiality Of the Platforms From A Culturally Critical Appr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistically, 'Intersectionality' may simply refer to the 'crossover' of multiple identities, but theoretically, Intersectionality is a product of Black Feminist Theory (Vincent 2018). It is argued that "as scholars, if we are not working against such re-inscriptions of power [..] and if we are not explicitly calling attention to power from a feminist, intersectional perspective, we are merely passive participants in what we have always proclaimed to be an actively engaged field" (De Hertogh et al 2019). True representation of participants is not always possible due to anonymisation, emotional labour and many other reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%