Feminist matters, critique and the future of the political

Abstract

Over the last decades, many scholars, feminist and others, have argued that critique must be reframed in different and more ‘productive’ ways because its ‘conventional’ formulation and practice have outlived its usefulness as a conceptual tool. Instead, they have called for affirmation or affirmative critique and a more generative mode of critical engagement in the search for new imaginaries, transformative potentialities and other futures. New feminist materialist thought’s emergence is, we argue, symptomatic of this contemporary intellectual landscape that claims to move beyond critique. While sympathetic with the desire to rethink a form of critique that speaks to the (urgent) politics of the present and the remaking of political imaginaries, we argue that the theoretical gesture to move beyond critique may offer a potentially troubling remapping organised around certain kinds of repression (of the undetermined and ambivalent work of critique) and amnesia (of feminist genealogies and over different feminist projects’ conceptualisation of matter) that yield a politics without politics.

‘I’ve Always Fought a Little against the Tide to Get Where I Want to Be’—Construction of Women’s Embodied Subjectivity in the Contested Terrain of High-Level Karate

“…8 For an evolving perspective from us, see also Bargetz and Sanos (2020). 9 Grades after black belt.…”

Feminist Literary Criticism Meets Feminist Theology: Yashodhara and the Rise of Hagiographical Fiction in Modern Feminist Re-visioning

“…. that yield a politics without a politics” (Bargetz & Sanos, 2020, p. 2) but offer brilliant ways to engage in non-oppositional ways especially by letting representations of gender speak to spiritual ways of being.…”

Deferring Difference No More: An (im)modest, relational plea from/through Karen Barad

“…In issuing an “(im)modest plea,” we enact a playful attitude while voicing an unashamed critique of MOS, which includes our own work in that field. In so doing, we orient toward the ambivalence inherent in feminist transformation and critique (Bargetz & Sanos, 2020). We name our “(im)modesty” to make fun of our own tendencies toward polemic and also to note that scholarship on difference, and scholarship by people deemed different, is often read as polemical (i.e., strident, indecorous, accusatory, impolite).…”