Child-centred pedagogy is both an enduring approach and a revered concept in Westernbased teacher preparation. This article weaves together major critiques of child-centred pedagogy that draw on critical feminist, postmodernist and post-structural theories. These critiques have particular relevance for conceptualizing what it can mean to be, and what it takes to become, an early childhood professional. The construct of the female early childhood professional is particularly important with the current intensification of the teacher as a technician and the increasing numbers in the workforce from racialized groups who may face social inequities. The construction of the individualized child and its parallel denial of the influences of gender, ethnicity and class on who a child becomes are equally important. Drawing upon the work of reconceptualist scholars, some preliminary ways will be proposed in which we can theorize and reconstruct children and early childhood professionals at the centre of a pedagogy that is a democratic space for all.In my own work as an early childhood educator, a primary school teacher and a teacher educator, child-centred pedagogy has had a tenacious hold on my thinking about teaching and learning. This tenacity is reflected in Grieshaber & Ryan's (2005, p. 9) observation that 'there is no doubt that child centeredness is an enduring and fixed entity in early childhood education. In fact, it could be said that it is a revered concept '. Cannella (1997, p. 130) has remarked upon child-centred pedagogy's apparent 'pedagogical determinism' for early childhood education settings. Moreover, to counter formal and academic programmes making headway into the early years, the 'rightness' of child-centred pedagogy has been invoked (Brooker, 2005). Yet, on a personal level, the following events in my teaching and research career have served to heighten my disquiet about child-centred pedagogy. When I was a kindergarten teacher, a manual advised me that my classroom should be so centred on the children that a visitor would not be able to identify who I was. Rendering me invisible struck me as poignantly counter to attempts to raise the respect and status of early childhood educators and to include the teacher as an important member of the classroom community. Later, I encouraged my students in a teacher preparation programme to embrace child-centred pedagogy. Yet as we discussed the role of the teacher in child-centredness as a 'facilitator', and 'stage manager', I felt uneasy about placing a group of predominantly young women struggling with the low status accorded their professional choice 'behind the scenes' of an early childhood education setting. Furthermore, there was something about the primacy of the teacher roles of observing and facilitating that seemed to me to unnecessarily limit the range of possible interactions between teachers and children. Finally, some of my own research findings added to my growing doubts about how we currently understand child-centred pedagogy (Langford,...