1997
DOI: 10.1080/09540259721286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist Praxis and the Gaze in the Early Childhood Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Or, it is also possible that the daycare workers did not 'see' gender. In her 1991 study of an Australian early childhood teacher, MacNaughton stated that modern approaches to curriculum development in early childhood education can support patriarchal gender relations by skewing the teacher's gaze and that a feminist reconstruction of this gaze is needed (MacNaughton 1997). She hopes that, in another 20 years, it will no longer be possible to find early childhood educators who fail to 'see' gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, it is also possible that the daycare workers did not 'see' gender. In her 1991 study of an Australian early childhood teacher, MacNaughton stated that modern approaches to curriculum development in early childhood education can support patriarchal gender relations by skewing the teacher's gaze and that a feminist reconstruction of this gaze is needed (MacNaughton 1997). She hopes that, in another 20 years, it will no longer be possible to find early childhood educators who fail to 'see' gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the emphasis on testing and assessment, performance indicators, league tables, stratified and hierarchical management and administration structures, have replaced the masculine nature of schools identified in the late 1980s with a postmodern 're-masculinisation' of primary education. (Skelton, 2002, p. 92) In the 1980s and 1990s, Australian scholars Clark (1989), Davies (1989a, b) and MacNaughton (1997) maintained that child-centred discourse, which is understood as gender-neutral in practice, functions to reproduce 'narrow regimes of gender' (Clark, 1989, p. 254). Clark has described the uncomfortable position female teachers are in when they allow extreme expressions of masculinity within the free child-centred setting and the undermining of their own confidence and 'teacher self'.…”
Section: The Male Child At the Centrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Maher, 2001, p. 27) The Female Child Outside of the Centre If the child at the centre of pedagogy is the male, where is the female child? Several writers (Walkerdine, 1985;Clark, 1989;MacNaughton, 1997) contend that essentialized gendered dichotomies between male and female children within child-centredness render regulated and constrained girls outside of the centre. Walkerdine (1985, p. 231) described how, within a gendered dichotomy, the female child's independent explorations are ignored and repressed while certain feminine qualities, such as conformity, good behaviour and neatness, are reinforced.…”
Section: The Male Child At the Centrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To classify as socially significant, the eye must linger on 'other' (or in some cases an object) as an indication of social orientation and, by extrapolation, preference. Such lingering often referred to, as 'a gaze' appears to offer important clues to researchers across multiple theoretical domains, including feminist literature (MacNaughton 1997). In recent studies of infant experience, several psychological studies compare the longer length of the gaze when newborn infants are shown human faces versus other social cues and, in doing so, make the claim that infants are more oriented to people than objects (see, for example, Ales et al 2012;Colonnesi et al 2012;Okumura et al 2013).…”
Section: The Significance Of the 'Look'mentioning
confidence: 97%