The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795331.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist stylistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feminist stylistics (e.g. Mills, 1995;Montoro, 2014) intersecting substantially with feminist literary theory (e.g. Eagleton, 2010;Moi, 2002) must by definition be concerned with the representation of women and gender relations and thus with such issues as whether Leda is reprehensible pornography or a great work of art.…”
Section: Morality In Literature Analysis and Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist stylistics (e.g. Mills, 1995;Montoro, 2014) intersecting substantially with feminist literary theory (e.g. Eagleton, 2010;Moi, 2002) must by definition be concerned with the representation of women and gender relations and thus with such issues as whether Leda is reprehensible pornography or a great work of art.…”
Section: Morality In Literature Analysis and Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the study discussed that stylistics was a mean to evaluate the impact of linguistics on literary effects. Current trends in stylistics have resulted in the development of sub-disciplines in the form of feminist stylistics (Montoro, 2014), cognitive stylistics (Burke, 2015, pp. 75-93) and discourse stylistics (Naciscione, 2017); these are all sustained by insight from feminist theory, cognitive theory and discourse theory respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above, these Handbooks represent major contributions to the discipline and this has been achieved by, crucially, avoiding sterile replication of material. For instance, several chapters in Burke focus on the analysis of what are considered general branches within the discipline, some of which are long-established – such as feminist stylistics (Montoro, 2014) or pedagogical stylistics (Hall, 2014) – with some others being more recent additions, such as (new) historical stylistics (Busse, 2014). In Stockwell and Whiteley, in contrast, various chapters highlight cross-fertilisation between stylistics and other disciplines by applying stylistics tenets to non-literary material, such as media stylistics (Lambrou and Durant, 2014) or political style (Charteris-Black, 2014).…”
Section: General Issues Of Stylementioning
confidence: 99%