Stylistics investigates style. A straightforward enough task, it might seem to the uninitiated. Stylisticians, on the other hand, see the investigation as a complex, diverse, intricate and sophisticated enterprise firmly grounded in linguistics. The question of how to define what style actually is does not, nor will it ever, have a simple answer. However, scholars whose work falls (in the strictest or loosest of senses) within the remit of stylistics concur as to how best to proceed when trying to account for it. For Simpson (2014: 4), stylistics' approach to style is primarily informed by the three 'Rs': Rigour, Retrievability and Replicability. Stockwell and Whiteley (2014: 1) emphasise that 'stylistics is the proper study of literature', meaning that it is 'delineated by rules and principles, and by reasonable, open and honest argument'. For Burke, stylistics 'is a kind of linguistic-forensic, literary discourse criticism' (Burke, 2014: 3). These three statements illustrate the defining methodological essence of the discipline: for as long as style is thoroughly, comprehensively and rigorously researched, stylisticians will openly and unashamedly make use of whichever analytical framework or theoretical tenets that can best account for it.The open embrace by stylistics of a variety of influences explicates its intrinsically interdisciplinary nature which, in turn, gives rise to fruitful and diverse research. The year 2014 has certainly not disappointed in that respect because it has witnessed the publication of diverse work from research on new text-types or genres (e.g. literary gaming) to research informed by corpus and multimodal approaches. As has been customary in previous Year's Work articles, the following pages have been divided into sections, each grouping together publications connected by similar interests, whether these are insights from cognate disciplines or particular analytical frameworks. Having said that, this division has a primarily explanatory function and should not be taken to indicate some hermetic compartmentalisation; in fact, as I go on to discuss, cross-fertilisation between the various research areas has been both bountiful and productive.
General issues of styleThree key 2014 publications have already been referred to: Simpson's second edition of Stylistics (2014), Stockwell and Whiteley's The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics 596395L AL0010.1177/0963947015596395Language and LiteratureMontoro research-article2015 Review Article Language and Literature 24(4) (2014) and Burke's The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics (2014). The danger of reviewing Handbooks of the calibre of Stockwell and Whiteley's (2014) and Burke's ( 2014) is that, inevitably, the review is limited by space constraints. What follows is a humble attempt at describing these two collections which represent major contributions to the field as they significantly develop stylistics tenets by expanding on existing ideas (even in supposedly classic topics), by bringing in original and detailed text analyses or, indeed, by a...