2011
DOI: 10.4074/s0003503311004039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

« Femme au volant… » : effet de la menace du stéréotype et de la colère sur les performances des femmes à une tâche liée à la conduite automobile

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour NecPlus. © NecPlus. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicate that each section of the questionnaire (i.e., male and female drivers) is organized in the hypothesized four-factor structure: risk avoidance, driving skills, compliance with traffic rules, and courtesy behind the wheel. These results are in line with previous studies which have shown that these four dimensions differentiate stereotypes on male and female drivers (Berger, 1986;Chateignier et al, 2011;Degraeve et al, 2014;Félonneau & Becker, 2011;Granié & Papafava, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Results indicate that each section of the questionnaire (i.e., male and female drivers) is organized in the hypothesized four-factor structure: risk avoidance, driving skills, compliance with traffic rules, and courtesy behind the wheel. These results are in line with previous studies which have shown that these four dimensions differentiate stereotypes on male and female drivers (Berger, 1986;Chateignier et al, 2011;Degraeve et al, 2014;Félonneau & Becker, 2011;Granié & Papafava, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While there was no significant difference regarding the easy items, older drivers under stereotype threat had a lower success rate in dealing with hard items than had their control counterparts, suggesting that part of their working memory resources was dedicated to managing the stereotype threat and, as our data tend to suggest, to contradict it (see also [24]). Thus, in line with the process model of stereotype threat [36], we observed that stereotype threat taxed working memory resources [37], although more research is needed to ascertain which concrete pathways (e.g., particular emotional settings, such as anger [61] or anxiety [27], including their suppression, [50]) led to this effect. As [36] puts it, whether the first reaction to stereotype threat consists of a physiological stress response, of self-relevant performance monitoring or of negative thoughts and their suppression, the core cognitive component that is commonly impacted is the working memory, and this also was the case in our study in our older drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…More specifically, the differentiated beliefs about the driving abilities of men and women could have direct implications on men and women behaviors and may cause effect of stereotype threat on women drivers. Previous studies (Chateignier et al, 2011;Félonneau & Becker, 2011;Yeung & von Hippel, 2008) thus provide evidence that risk-taking is under the influence of gender identity, specifically the mobilization of individuals belonging to a social sex group and of behaviors allowing the individual to demonstrate this social identity. These beliefs could explain why, even before they start driving, the boys have riskier attitudes than girls in terms of speed and not wearing a seatbelt (Harré et al, 1996;Mann & Lansdown, 2009) and why girls' and boys' attitudes toward driver training differ, with boys feeling more competent as driver than girls, even before they start learning to drive (Nyberg & Gregersen, 2007;Wiberg, 2006).…”
Section: Practical Consequences From a Traffic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the framework of the stereotype threat phenomenon (Steele & Aronson, 1995), these stereotypes provide the foundation for strong inductive inferences, which can have significant cognitive and behavioral consequences, and particularly for the driving activity. Studies thus showed that negative beliefs associated with female drivers could lead to an impairment of their driving performances (Chateignier, Chekroun, Nugier, & Dutrévis, 2011;Félonneau & Becker, 2011;Yeung & von Hippel, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%