2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00242-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral head measurement in hemiarthroplasty: assessment of interobserver error using 3 measuring systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both head options were available in 1 mm size increments. The diameter of the femoral head was measured using full circular measurement templates during surgery (Jeffery and Ong 2000 ), and the corresponding prosthetic head size was chosen ( Table 1 ). Arthroplasty was performed through a posterior approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, using spinal anesthesia.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both head options were available in 1 mm size increments. The diameter of the femoral head was measured using full circular measurement templates during surgery (Jeffery and Ong 2000 ), and the corresponding prosthetic head size was chosen ( Table 1 ). Arthroplasty was performed through a posterior approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, using spinal anesthesia.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using undersized bipolar heads was avoided so there would not be increased polar wear and acetabular erosion that was claimed by Paolo et al 12. The authors also used the full circular template measuring system to get the most accurate head size because using the caliper measuring system underestimates the head size as claimed by Jeffery et al 13. The implant used for the DMTHA group was Serf NOVAE Evolution cementless DM cup (Serf, Dècines-Charpieu, France) and Zimmer Biomet Exception cementless stem (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caution was taken not to use an oversized bipolar head, and the joint was found to be relatively lax 11 in order not to overstuff the joint to minimize the acetabular wear as much as possible. Using undersized bipolar heads was avoided so there would not be increased polar wear and acetabular erosion that was claimed by Paolo et al 12 The authors also used the full circular template measuring system to get the most accurate head size because using the caliper measuring system underestimates the head size as claimed by Jeffery et al 13 The implant used for the DMTHA group was Serf NOVAE Evolution cementless DM cup (Serf, Dècines-Charpieu, France) and Zimmer Biomet Exception cementless stem (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana). The follow-up was for 2 yr and included the HHS to assess the function.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The femoral head was considered to be a perfect sphere with a mean diameter of 47 mm [11] and centered at the origin of a right-handed three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system. Axes xyz (Figures 1 and 2) correspond to an AP view where the anteversion angle has been cancelled out by internally rotating the hip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%