2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02481-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral offset loss and internal arch restoration defect are correlated with intramedullary nail cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Femoral offset and precision of neck-shaft angle restoration were correlated with TAD outcomes. During the closed reduction procedure, rigorous intraoperative control of femoral offset and neck-shaft angle distinguishes non-optimal reductions [ 13 ]. With our technical note of double compression in two-screw cephalomedullary nailing systems, we eliminate any fracture gap remaining by implant limitations and reach a stable osteosynthesis of the peritrochanteric fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral offset and precision of neck-shaft angle restoration were correlated with TAD outcomes. During the closed reduction procedure, rigorous intraoperative control of femoral offset and neck-shaft angle distinguishes non-optimal reductions [ 13 ]. With our technical note of double compression in two-screw cephalomedullary nailing systems, we eliminate any fracture gap remaining by implant limitations and reach a stable osteosynthesis of the peritrochanteric fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was evidence to show the potential correlation between the neck-shaft angle and TAD in IEF patients. For example, Boukebous et al calculated the neck-shaft angle gap between the fractured and the healthy sides and found the average TAD can reach 27 mm in patients with a 7% eck-shaft angle gap rate [32]. Walton et al demonstrated the number of patients with TAD greater than 25 mm was more in the group with the neck-shaft angle < 125°compared to those having the neck-shaft angle > 125°(27.8% vs 12.6%) [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%