2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-017-0910-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtocaching assisted multi-source D2D content delivery in cellular networks

Abstract: The influxes of diversified services and mass data lead to exponential growth of traffic load in mobile cellular networks. Cache-enabled device-to-device (D2D) communication provides a general framework to alleviate this situation. In contrast to previous single-source D2D models, this paper investigates a comprehensive content delivery framework based on a three-tier heterogeneous network (HetNet), where base station (BS), femtocaching auxiliary equipments (FAEs), and user terminals(UTs) are included. The coo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6a,b show the hit rate of four caching algorithms. In addition to the caching algorithm in [10], we also contrast our collaborative caching scheme against two classical caching algorithms: random caching and the most popular caching based on the file popularity. The algorithm in [10] combines the random caching with the most popular aching, i.e., fixed nodes like SBSs use the most popular algorithm, while UTs use random storage due to the mobility.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 6a,b show the hit rate of four caching algorithms. In addition to the caching algorithm in [10], we also contrast our collaborative caching scheme against two classical caching algorithms: random caching and the most popular caching based on the file popularity. The algorithm in [10] combines the random caching with the most popular aching, i.e., fixed nodes like SBSs use the most popular algorithm, while UTs use random storage due to the mobility.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the caching algorithm in [10], we also contrast our collaborative caching scheme against two classical caching algorithms: random caching and the most popular caching based on the file popularity. The algorithm in [10] combines the random caching with the most popular aching, i.e., fixed nodes like SBSs use the most popular algorithm, while UTs use random storage due to the mobility. It can be observed that the proposed collaborative system brings greater caching gains owing to the dynamic and flexible characteristics, i.e., the edge nodes tend to have more great autonomy in collaborative caching.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach initially figures the separation between the discoverer device situated at (X , Y) and the discovery devices situated at X ′ , Y ′ , also indicating the separation of the ith discoverer devices from the discovery device, b is a constant to define the state of the logarithmic, l is an arbitrary number in [−1, 1] , and ⋅ is a dot product [24].…”
Section: Echolocation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is a signal transfer factor, which signifies the effect of meeting probability by signal transfer. From (22) to (24), if device S and device D encounter each other more regularly in the network, the meeting probability among them becomes larger. When two devices encounter each other in the network, the discovery signal will be redirected to the device that meets more regularly with the destination device.…”
Section: Discovery Meeting Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%