2017
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.17.09727-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fenestrated and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included 15 studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] 25 was included as the 15th study because it contains 2-year follow-up data from the 2015 study by Michel et al 24 Of the 20 studies that had met the inclusion criteria, five had contained duplicate data presented in other studies and, therefore, were excluded from the present meta-analysis. [31][32][33][34][35] No randomized controlled trials had evaluated the outcomes of endovascular vs open repair for JRAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We included 15 studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] 25 was included as the 15th study because it contains 2-year follow-up data from the 2015 study by Michel et al 24 Of the 20 studies that had met the inclusion criteria, five had contained duplicate data presented in other studies and, therefore, were excluded from the present meta-analysis. [31][32][33][34][35] No randomized controlled trials had evaluated the outcomes of endovascular vs open repair for JRAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable Sala-Almonacil et al 16 Bruen et al 17 Chinsakchai et al 18 Donas et al 19 Fiorucci et al 20 One point was given for a positive answer and zero points for a negative or unclear answer.…”
Section: Table II Study Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lack of precise and objective information regarding aneurysm neck anatomy, pooling of shortneck aneurysms with aneurysms without a neck as well as aneurysms of the visceral aortic segment and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms seriously limits the value of most published evidence. [11][12][13][14] These sources of bias, confounding and heterogeneity, have been consistently recognised as weaknesses in the evidence base by authors of systematic reviews. 15 16 There is therefore a pressing need to generate comparative effectiveness evidence in this area with adequate internal and external validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in most analyses, patients are grouped by the operation techniques used rather than the detail of the anatomy being treated. A lack of precise and objective information regarding aneurysm neck anatomy, pooling of short-neck aneurysms with aneurysms without a neck as well as aneurysms of the visceral aortic segment and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms seriously limits the value of most published evidence 11–14. These sources of bias, confounding and heterogeneity, have been consistently recognised as weaknesses in the evidence base by authors of systematic reviews 15 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%