2015
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FERAL: network-based classifier with application to breast cancer outcome prediction

Abstract: Motivation: Breast cancer outcome prediction based on gene expression profiles is an important strategy for personalize patient care. To improve performance and consistency of discovered markers of the initial molecular classifiers, network-based outcome prediction methods (NOPs) have been proposed. In spite of the initial claims, recent studies revealed that neither performance nor consistency can be improved using these methods. NOPs typically rely on the construction of meta-genes by averaging the expressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this cannot be naively assumed to be true. 31 As with Venet et al's work on genomic signatures for breast cancer outcome, 29 we observe a similar phenomenon in proteomics (Tables 1C and 2C). By the CVAccuracy alone, it would appear that any method is good for class prediction.…”
Section: In Proteomics Standard Feature-selection Approaches Do No Bsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Unfortunately, this cannot be naively assumed to be true. 31 As with Venet et al's work on genomic signatures for breast cancer outcome, 29 we observe a similar phenomenon in proteomics (Tables 1C and 2C). By the CVAccuracy alone, it would appear that any method is good for class prediction.…”
Section: In Proteomics Standard Feature-selection Approaches Do No Bsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A single step variance based gene identification method has been discussed in 12 . The method collects the event data from united state firms.…”
Section: Methods Exploredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the survival analysis results in the 349 original study [56], we achieved more significant sample stratifications with EMT [22,24,35]. Some accredit this to the existence of a large number of genes 357 that are correlated with the target labels [12]. Given the limited amount of samples, it 358 becomes very hard to differentiate the marker genes and irrelevant genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%