2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermentation monitoring by Bayesian states estimators. Application to red wines elaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the approach relies on a linearization of the system, the estimator can diverge if the initial estimate of the state is too far from the real state. Other algorithms that do not rely on mechanistic models of the fermentation process, such as non-parametric Gaussian trackers [8], have proved their efficacy, but can fail to capture the constraints and nonlinearities of the real system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the approach relies on a linearization of the system, the estimator can diverge if the initial estimate of the state is too far from the real state. Other algorithms that do not rely on mechanistic models of the fermentation process, such as non-parametric Gaussian trackers [8], have proved their efficacy, but can fail to capture the constraints and nonlinearities of the real system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the results of nominal optimization, a methodology called "run to run" optimization appears, which uses previous runs information to optimize the operation of subsequent ones [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Another strategy is the online optimization of the model parameters [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. is kind of optimization is difficult to perform since the available models might only be locally valid and thus inappropriate for predicting final concentrations [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%