2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-014-2187-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermentative aptitude of non-Saccharomyces wine yeast for reduction in the ethanol content in wine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
43
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…pombe strains was more nearly linear than those of the wild strains and that the wild strains had more similar fermentation kinetics to S. cerevisiae even though they were slightly slower. In each Kutyna et al, 2010;Gobbi et al, 2014;Contreras et al, 2014). Previous studies with S. pombe have showed slight reductions up to 0.5 g/L when compared to the Saccharomyces control (Benito et al, 2013) in some instances.…”
Section: Fermentation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…pombe strains was more nearly linear than those of the wild strains and that the wild strains had more similar fermentation kinetics to S. cerevisiae even though they were slightly slower. In each Kutyna et al, 2010;Gobbi et al, 2014;Contreras et al, 2014). Previous studies with S. pombe have showed slight reductions up to 0.5 g/L when compared to the Saccharomyces control (Benito et al, 2013) in some instances.…”
Section: Fermentation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…ethanol produced per glucose consumed) than S. cerevisiae while fermenting grape juice under anaerobic conditions (Ciani et al 2006;Gobbi et al 2014). This is one of the reasons why non-Saccharomyces species are included in the strategies of reducing ethanol content in wines (Heux et al 2006;Kutyna et al 2010), also by taking advantage of the different distribution of the Crabtree effect throughout wine yeasts (Gonzalez et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From a technological point of view, the osmophile yeast strains, belonging to the Zygosaccharomyces genus, and isolated from batches of spontaneously fermented cooked must , are the least suitable for cooked must fermentation, since they leave high percentages of unfermented glucose in the media. In contrast, less osmotolerant yeasts, belonging to the genus Saccharomycodes and isolated from maturing barrels of TBV, showed a marked preference for glucose (Gobbi et al 2014).…”
Section: The Influence Of Yeast Species and Strain On The Compositionmentioning
confidence: 95%