2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermentative profiles of field pea (Pisum sativum), faba bean (Vicia faba) and white lupin (Lupinus albus) silages as affected by wilting and inoculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
33
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between groups were not statistically significant. The presence of butyric acid is consistent with previous findings of Borreani et al (2009) for field pea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between groups were not statistically significant. The presence of butyric acid is consistent with previous findings of Borreani et al (2009) for field pea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The wilting leads to a decrease in moisture and the addition of inoculants affects the fermentation and reduces many negative effects of unacceptable fermentation (Wright et al, 2000). According to Borreani et al (2009), wilting is applied to reduce dry matter losses in the effluent and to lower the weight of water that has to be transported from the field to the silo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CV silage showed the highest values of pH, which is in agreement with PURSIAINEN & TUORI (2008); this result in both studies could reflect the low content of water-soluble carbohydrates of legume silage, which enhances clostridial fermentation and butyric acid production (BORREANI et al, 2009). The CV silage had the highest values of CP, which is a desirable nutritional component in rabbit nutrition; however, it should be taken into account that a higher protein content can be associated with higher rates of proteolysis in legume silage (CAVALLARIN et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As climate causes differences in actual yield from year to year [30], we calculated annual average yield using provincial data on crop production from 2000 to 2008 (ISTAT, www.istat.it/ agricoltura/datiagri/coltivazioni.). As site-specific N content data are not available, we used average values commonly reported in the literature [31][32][33]. The variation in the crops' N content (mainly due to crop variety, climate, soil properties, and management) was assumed to be on the order of 25% [23].…”
Section: N-balance Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%