2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi-gas interpretation of the RSOS path representation of the superconformal unitary minimal models

Abstract: We derive new finitized fermionic characters for the superconformal unitary minimal models by interpreting the RSOS configuration sums as fermi-gas partition functions. This extends to the supersymmetric case the method introduced by Warnaar for the Virasoro unitary mimimal models. The key point in this construction is the proper identification of fermi-type charged particles in terms of the path's peaks. For this, an instrumental preliminary step is the adaptation to the superconformal case of the operator de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these models, the constructive method following the lines of [28] is not so directly worked out. It turns out that in this context, the logic underlying the fermi-gas description of the paths is reversed: a path has a natural operator construction and it is this very operator interpretation which, once finitized, allows us to clearly identify the particles within the path [22]. We suspect that the same situation will hold for the fermi-gas analysis of the more general models [9] su(2) k ⊗ su(2) ℓ / su(2) k+ℓ , for ℓ > 2: working at the level of the operator basis induced by the path description is likely to be simpler than working directly at the level of the paths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these models, the constructive method following the lines of [28] is not so directly worked out. It turns out that in this context, the logic underlying the fermi-gas description of the paths is reversed: a path has a natural operator construction and it is this very operator interpretation which, once finitized, allows us to clearly identify the particles within the path [22]. We suspect that the same situation will hold for the fermi-gas analysis of the more general models [9] su(2) k ⊗ su(2) ℓ / su(2) k+ℓ , for ℓ > 2: working at the level of the operator basis induced by the path description is likely to be simpler than working directly at the level of the paths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this bijection, we can now verify the expressions (26) and (27) giving the values of s and j for P paths. For the expression of j l , we have…”
Section: Bijection S ↔ Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where in the last step, we used h L+1 = h L +(−1) L+2j (cf. (26)) and a case-by-case comparison of the two sides of the equality. This is the announced expression (27).…”
Section: Bijection S ↔ Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial point is the demonstration of the weight preserving character of the bijection, namely, the proof of (14). To present the key point without the complications induced by the boundary effects, let us restrict to the case s = r = 1, for which ŵgsc = 0.…”
Section: Rsos(p ′ P) Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, with the edges NE, SE and H represented respectively by 1, 1 and 0, the three configurations with m 3 = m 4 = 1, regarded e.g. as B(5,14) paths (cf. Fig.8), are :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%